Site is currently unresponsive. Cached version: http://archive.is/bklNU
Has anyone noticed that archive.is has pretty apalling dns-based tracking?
Can you explain what you mean?
FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
11–20 of 76 posts
Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#12Is this from the 2016 hack or a new one?
> Unfortunately, this is not the first time TeamViewer is the victim of threat actors. About four years ago...
Sounds like a new one.
Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Has anyone noticed that archive.is has pretty apalling dns-based tracking?
Can you explain what you mean?
Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#14How do we tell if we are affected? Also, how could it do anything if TV isn't open?
Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#15Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#16How do we tell if we are affected? Also, how could it do anything if TV isn't open?
This is from 2016. It's hard to say how you can tell without knowing what techniques were used against you specifically,if you have FireEye's network or endpoint products (or any other major vendor) they would provide coverage for any remnants of compromise by that threat actor.
Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#17Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#18Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#19Re: FireEye confirms APT41 hacked TeamViewer, may have accessed billions of devices
#20Reposting what TheKnack said [0] as a top level comment, since this is important.
> The Chief Security Architect of FireEye posted this Tweet last week clarifying that there isn't a new compromise of TeamViewer, and the social media posts suggesting there is are misinterpreting a slide from a conference presentation.