Interesting. I'd been toying with signing up for Disney+ at some point (when does it even go live officially?). But if this is the case, I absolutely won't be getting a subscription as I use Linux as my desktop OS. "No Linux support" == "no customer"
While I agree with the philosophy that Disney should try to support as many platforms as possible, I really don't think it will notice the Linux market is missing. Cost of building and maintaining a Linux client > Potential revenue from Linux users.
Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
21–30 of 330 posts
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#22Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
While I agree with the philosophy that Disney should try to support as many platforms as possible, I really don't think it will notice the Linux market is missing. Cost of building and maintaining a Linux client > Potential revenue from Linux users.
Looks like this is more of "requiring widevine level 2/3", their player and DRM should work with Linux Firefox and Chrome with minimal changes. > Disney+ OTOH seems to have the drm features kranked up to maximum draconian settings
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks like this is more of "requiring widevine level 2/3", their player and DRM should work with Linux Firefox and Chrome with minimal changes. > Disney+ OTOH seems to have the drm features kranked up to maximum draconian settings
So you figure maybe a week before it's all on bittorrent anyway?
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#25Interesting. I'd been toying with signing up for Disney+ at some point (when does it even go live officially?). But if this is the case, I absolutely won't be getting a subscription as I use Linux as my desktop OS. "No Linux support" == "no customer"
While I agree with the philosophy that Disney should try to support as many platforms as possible, I really don't think it will notice the Linux market is missing. Cost of building and maintaining a Linux client > Potential revenue from Linux users.
Isn’t ChromeOS Linux under the hood?
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#26Widevine on Linux only supports L3, which means that there's no guarantee that any processing is done inside the CPU's trusted execution environment. Which, uh, reads as "no security guarantee" to me.
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#27AmazonPrime video does not delivers HD content in Linux... I tried everything switching browsers, changing User agent, wine, running virtual box. I seems some type of DRM is not implemented yet in Linux. Netflix is the same I think. I happily pirate content now.
If you don’t believe that copying not approved by the publisher is just like kidnapping and murder, you might prefer not to use the word “piracy” to describe it.
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
While I agree with the philosophy that Disney should try to support as many platforms as possible, I really don't think it will notice the Linux market is missing. Cost of building and maintaining a Linux client > Potential revenue from Linux users.
Cost of building a Linux client should be zero. It's not because they want to have their proprietary DRM/spyware restricting what you can do. Ever heard the phrase "piracy is a better service", Disney? Edit: Cost should be negligible. You should build for web/browser standards, not the OS.
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#29> instead send them a message letting them know that you are boycotting them until they get their Linux support in order A boycott from all 12 desktop Linux users. That'll show 'em.
Re: Disney+ streaming uses draconian DRM
#30Why do you need to write that? It’s a benign article and more so it’s about as protective as the useless “Store is not responsible for carts that damage your car” signs.