Live data from Hacker News

Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

bbc.com

201–210 of 573 posts

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think Google Maps not saving your history as you described is an incredibly bad, frustrating experience. FFS, my phone has gigs of RAM, why can’t Google Maps remember the address I searched for ten minutes ago? One minute ago? This is 2019. It has been this bad for a decade plus. Embarrassing IMO and demonstrates true UX myopia and true UX incompetence.

Personally I switched to Apple Maps after the iOS 13 release and haven't looked back. Because it's integrated into the OS, Apple Maps can look into your messages and auto-complete addresses from that. It can also save places without you signing into an account. The only thing I miss is google's "offline" mode. I live in Michigan, and I frequently go on trips up north into heavily wooded areas. I don't always get cell…

I also nuked google maps from my iPhone after iOS 13.

I share your frustration.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#202
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see anything in the parent comment that says this is a Google-only issue. Also, the Netflix and Amazon examples don't seem to be in the same category, to me. Every time you interact with Netflix and Amazon, you are doing so deliberately. You are choosing exactly what to give them. You can easily pick another service. Always-on listening devices, on the other hand, are taking data that you did not choose to gi…

Amazon is the only one of the GAFAMs that it's not practical to boycott : boycotting Amazon Web Services breaks a large part of the Web.

Does AWS perform end user tracking?

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#203
post #115

I was a huge Google Fan but this is becoming lunacy. I understood trading some data and privacy for great search results, maps and free quality email. But people willingly bringing always on listening devices in to their homes (beyond what smartphones are already capable of) I just can't comprehend it. Why would people voluntarily do this in exchange for being able to ask for weather, play a playlist, add a todo and…

> people willingly bringing always on listening devices in to their homes I just can't comprehend it. The reason is "people" lack education in technology. They can barely use a computer these days, with "using a computer" generally means being on Facebook with a browser. There's a very significant divide in this regard that has been growing for decades. And it isn't getting any better. This is why it is nearly imposs…

> All this says it is the responsibility of the tech community to make sure customers understand the important aspects of the technology we provide.

Which is difficult as long as some peoples income depends on not making sure that customers understand.

As much as I'd like to pretend we are all morally and ethically acting grown ups, reality tells us we are not. Ultimately this needs to be regulated by law and continually enforced. It seems like regulation is slowly rolling in, but enforcement seems to still be far out.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#204
post #115

I was a huge Google Fan but this is becoming lunacy. I understood trading some data and privacy for great search results, maps and free quality email. But people willingly bringing always on listening devices in to their homes (beyond what smartphones are already capable of) I just can't comprehend it. Why would people voluntarily do this in exchange for being able to ask for weather, play a playlist, add a todo and…

People just don't know how valuable this data actually is. Sure it only gets value if a critical quantity is reached.

There is just a disconnect in understanding. With huge efforts they will create archives of 5% special price coupons, but how tech companies extract free money from them is beyond their comprehension.

The implications of having every deed and word quantified is perhaps too abstract a danger to understand.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I gotta be that guy and recommend DuckDuckGo. No, it's not always as good as Google search, but it's still usually good enough and when you -really- need Google you can simply add "g!". Every other time, you can rest assured your searches aren't feeding some AI. DDG is at least a reasonable way to ween yourself off Google search rather than needing to go full cold turkey.

As I always do when this is suggested, I recommend using “!s” for Startpage instead of “!g” for Google. Similar to DDG, Startpage provides results in a privacy respecting way, but it uses Google instead of Bing (and Oath), which DDG uses. There’s a common misconception amongst some that using !g on DDG is private, but it’s just a redirect, so Google can gather information from that search. Using !s as the fallback in…

I don't understand the business model of Startpage. They pay Google for using their search engine. Their revenue comes from non-personalised advertising.

So that means either Startpage has higher ad margins than Google or Google is selling services to Startpage below their own search margins or Startpage has some other source of funds to subsidise the search engine.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#206
post #132
post #100

FWIW, I'm living a Google-free live now, and it works very well: - DuckDuckGo as default search engine - Own domain for email, forwarded to Apple's mail - Apple map, Yandex map, Waze, Here WeGo for maps (depending on the country) - For videos, I search them in DDG with " !yt", then copy the links I want and download them with `youtube-dl` - Firefox and Safari - Zoho as a replacement for online docs and spreadsheets e…

You're likely not at all living "Google free". https://gizmodo.com/i-cut-google-out-of-my-life-it-screwed-u...

Informative, thanks.

Hmmmm, Uber, Lyft, and Dropbox - I avoid those, too.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#207
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

of course I do, it's alluded to in my comment: "(beyond what smartphones are already capable of)" I agree, smart phones provide the same surveillance capabilities of 'smart' speakers and more. But supposedly phones aren't always on and listening to all your audio like the 'smart' speakers. This might just be a divide in society, some people accept surveillance as not an issue and are fine with it. Would you place a s…

But saying "beyond what smartphones are already capable of" diminishes the fact that they are also always listening, and are also generally near where you are. Siri, by default, is always listening. Most people don't understand or know this. People are then amazed when they put their phone on a table and say "Hey Siri" from across the room.

It's very different. Smart speakers are much better at invading privacy.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#208
post #177
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see anything in the parent comment that says this is a Google-only issue. Also, the Netflix and Amazon examples don't seem to be in the same category, to me. Every time you interact with Netflix and Amazon, you are doing so deliberately. You are choosing exactly what to give them. You can easily pick another service. Always-on listening devices, on the other hand, are taking data that you did not choose to gi…

> Every time you interact with ... Amazon, you are doing so deliberately. Don't forget that Echo devices are Amazon's always-on listening devices.

Yes, sure, but that wasn't what the comment I was replying to was talking about... This is about the difference between always-on listeners, including Echo, and stores where you buy things.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#209
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I wanted to try the google podcasts but it was a brick because I had disabled "youtube & web activity" This is the worst. I have all the privacy settings turned up. In Google Maps on my phone, when I try to set my "Home" location, it tells me I need to turn on "Web and App Activity". What? Why? How are these two things related? Why do you have to track what apps I use and upload this info to Google in order to reme…

I had an app that refused to work unless high accuracy location was turned on. There was a location aspect to it but demanding the highest setting of location sharing was vastly overreaching and I just uninstalled the app.

Out of curiosity how did you know the precision of location the app was asking for? If I recall correctly android gives the same permission prompt for fine and course location.

Re: Google chief: I'd disclose smart speakers before guests enter my home

#210

I know it puts me in the minority, but I honestly do not care that much. It's obfuscation by volume. If Google wants to hear me and my roommate argue about Red Dead Redemption online or the new Bill Burr comedy special, good luck with that. When I worked in IT, people always used to say oh you can read my emails? Nobody wants to read about your boring-ass life. My understanding is they are using our speech to create…

> Nobody wants to read about your boring-ass life.

On the contrary, aggregated personal data sells for a lot of money. Entire companies exist only to collect it.

Post reply on HN