Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s actually a good argument for registering guns. I have to register for my voting rights, you have to register for your gun rights.
As we see from this very article, the outcome of making people register for their rights is to deny them their rights. Don't race to the bottom, we'll all just end up... at the bottom.
Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
61–70 of 244 posts
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#62There doesn't appear to be an explanation for the purges. I can understand the need to purge the voter lists of "dead" (literally or otherwise) entries, but surely it would be best if the state provided an explanation for each removal?
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
How hard is it really for a voter to reregister? You guys are making it sound like it they're taking away driver's licenses or something. All you have to do is hit the website. If you don't have internet access hit a library.
You don't find out you need to re-register until it's too late.
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#64According to the article, moderate Republicans in Ohio insisted on transparency for purging voter rolls. They sent out the proposed list to various voter advocacy groups across the political spectrum, which reviewed the proposed changes and flagged mistakes. 80% were purged correctly. 20% were not. Rather than condemning Ohio, they should be praised for bringing transparency to the process (as long as the mistakes ar…
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#65> She went online and discovered that her name had also been flagged as an inactive voter. The state was in the process of removing her from its voter rolls. > “I voted three times last year,” said Ms. Miller. I am still baffled at the election system in this country. Every state does its own thing. One state uses paper, other uses some machines which can be easily hacked, some use both. Somehow voter ID is controver…
It's dead simple. But it hinges on the state having a database with every citizen's address. As I understand it such an idea would be very unpopular in the US.
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The US is strange: It will wring its hands over low voter turnout while also actively making it more difficult to vote. Hint: the people wringing their hands and the people making it more difficult to vote are not the same groups.
> It will wring its hands over low voter turnout while also actively making it more difficult to vote. The republicans generally would prefer that lower-income folks don't vote because they generally vote for democrats, so of course they would like to see voter turn-out to be low.
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#67> She went online and discovered that her name had also been flagged as an inactive voter. The state was in the process of removing her from its voter rolls. > “I voted three times last year,” said Ms. Miller. I am still baffled at the election system in this country. Every state does its own thing. One state uses paper, other uses some machines which can be easily hacked, some use both. Somehow voter ID is controver…
One of 2 major parties in the US has made making it hard for people to vote a central strategy. This has happened in the past as well.
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do people have to register to vote at all? The state has a sort of pretty solid idea of where they live...
To make it more difficult for prospective voters who are perhaps not white, poorer, younger, are working multiple jobs, or are a single parent, just to name a few examples. You can connect the dots on why groups like these are disenfranchised by the state.
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do people have to register to vote at all? The state has a sort of pretty solid idea of where they live...
To make it more difficult for prospective voters who are perhaps not white, poorer, younger, are working multiple jobs, or are a single parent, just to name a few examples. You can connect the dots on why groups like these are disenfranchised by the state.
Re: Ohio Was Set to Purge 235,000 Voters. It Was Wrong About 20%
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't most places allow same day registration at the polls? Every state I've voted in does. Edit: ok, 2/5ths isn't most but it's still a lot. Chill with the down-votes, it was an honest question, not an attack on your ideology.
Most do not. > As of June 30, 2019, a total of 21 states plus the District of Columbia have enacted same day registration (SDR), which allows any qualified resident of the state to go to register to vote and cast a ballot all in that day. http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/same-da... And, same day isn't necessarily the best solution. For example, Oregon does vote-by-mail. This process would make it…