Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
131–140 of 303 posts
Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is why, IMHO, Walmart will eventually win this aspect of the online shopping war. Supply chain control. Amazon may continue to dominate AWS and even the 3rd party marketplace, but they've already ruined their brand reputation as a supplier. Edit: Sold and shipped 3rd party marketplace may survive.
It's not like shopping at Wal-Mart isn't without its own kinds of bait and switch practices. There was a time when I went to Wal-Mart to buy a new package of cheap cotton ankle socks every month or so, incrementally replenishing my cache, over the period of about a year. The exact same brand, make, and size of socks, what were ostensibly identical , would vary in their constituent materials at what seemed to be rando…
If you want consistency in terms of quality, go upmarket. Even a JC Penney or Kohl’s will be more consistent for the socks.
Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#133Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#134Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#135Amazon's inaction is just welcoming and awaiting for a government-led crackdown
Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup, agreed 100%. I recently purchased 2 Lenovo 65w USB-C chargers. One came shrink-wrapped in a legitimate Lenovo box. The other was in a plain cardboard box with a prominent "Made in China" as its only branding. These were sold from the very same product page. When I told Amazon, I had to go to UPS to return the fake product to them to receive my refund, so not only do I have to purchase it again (obviously not fro…
For whatever reason, the counterfeiters have no problem lying about anything, except the "Made in China" label. I'm sure there's a good reason for this, but it's been the only consistent red-flag I've encountered.
Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup, agreed 100%. I recently purchased 2 Lenovo 65w USB-C chargers. One came shrink-wrapped in a legitimate Lenovo box. The other was in a plain cardboard box with a prominent "Made in China" as its only branding. These were sold from the very same product page. When I told Amazon, I had to go to UPS to return the fake product to them to receive my refund, so not only do I have to purchase it again (obviously not fro…
For whatever reason, the counterfeiters have no problem lying about anything, except the "Made in China" label. I'm sure there's a good reason for this, but it's been the only consistent red-flag I've encountered.
Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree, we may not know the extent of the problem. But if they are tracking sources as well as they claim to be, the problem wouldn't keep growing like it is. There's a major disconnect somewhere... And you kinda make my point. The practice is for the benefit of Amazon, not us. (It still benefits Amazon to sell fakes already within their inventory.) >Multiple quantity from different sellers shouldn't be combined Yet…
Why do you think the problem is growing, and that it has to do with commingling? Re multiple quantity: have you gotten counterfeit and authentic product in the same box?
Some problematic products, I've ordered a couple dozen times and never gotten a genuine product.
>in the same box?
Yes, multiple times, although probably less than 10. And a couple were supposed single seller items. Didn't matter.
(One case initially got my account flagged and couldn't buy anything else until I sent pictures for proof. One of the only times I've ever had Amazon call me.)
However, the much more common occurrence is variance over separate orders.
Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#139As an aside, why does nearly every Twitter link take you to a page not found thus requiring a reload? This is a terrible user experience that should be easy to fix.
Re: Counterfeit books “shipped and sold by Amazon”?
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
$ to support non-JS users > $ revenue from non-JS users
That is simply not true in this case. All I need to get twitter readable with no-script is this ublock origin rule: ! 7/24/2019 https://twitter.com twitter.com##form.NoScriptForm The data (tweets) are there already, they just intentionally hide it.
I use UBO to block js across the web by default and would like to include twitter but their "no-js" site is garbage.