Live data from Hacker News

‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

nytimes.com

161–170 of 291 posts

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#161

I used to think power outages we’re mainly a developing country problem, this definitely changes my understanding of the tiers of maturity of countries.

It's pretty common for rural areas in the U.S. to have power failures during storms. Maybe not in California, though?

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Need it be an all-or-nothing proposition? I imagine there being some particular places where it'd make good sense to bury some lines.

San Diego (SDGE) has a plan to bury most lines in the next 50 years. I feel like this would happen faster if they were not beholden to shareholders (NYSE:SRE). Distribution and the charges associated with it are government aided monopolies... Should a publicly traded company have a gov granted monopoly?

As far as I can find, SDGE is only burying their distribution lines. Their 1900 miles of transmission lines (which often cut through flammable wilderness areas) will remain above ground.

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#163

PG&E is the worst power company in the western hemisphere. First in 2000 they had massive power outages due to early deregulation which led to the impeachment of governor Gray Davis. In 2017 the company killed thousands of customers and billions in property because of fires they caused! Now in 2019 they are doing massive shutdowns and directly killing their customers on life support! We have the highest prices (.22c…

PG&E is a terrible company, but spewing a bunch of nonsense hyperbole isn't helpful. Someone else pointed out that your statements about deaths are false. So I'll point out that California's electricity isn't 22¢/kWh. The California average is 16.06¢. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/ States that have it worse: Hawaii: 26.05¢ Alaska: 19.10¢ Connecticut: 17.55¢ Massachusetts: 17.12¢ Rhode Island: 16.42¢ New Hamps…

> California average is 16.06¢

Not sure how they come up with such a number, but California is large and has many electricity providers.

But for PG&E in the Bay Area, let me quote from my PG&E electric bill here in hand:

Daytime: $0.53476 (delivery) + $0.25069 (generation) = $0.785/kWh

Part-peak: $0.28917 (delivery) + $0.10643 (generation) = $0.396/kWh

Night: $0.13578 (delivery) + $0.03968 (generation) = $0.175/kWh

The cheapest rate is 17.5 cents per kWh, that is late at night (currently after 11pm, soon to be changed to be after midnight).

Daytime rate is 78.5 cents per kWh! This is PG&E in the Bay Area.

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#164

"as climate change makes wildfires more frequent and intense." That's reporter bias. I'm not saying it's right or wrong but to throw that in there is clear bias.

NASA agrees with the reporter: https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/wildfires.html

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Private utilites work just fine in every other state. Maybe this just a California being California issue again. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater...

Private utilites work just fine in every other state. Do they? The feds already had to step in when private companies deemed large swaths of the United States unprofitable (see also: rural electrification and the TVA).

> Do they?

Yes, they do. ERCOT, as one example, is doing just fine, many of the southwest power companies are private and aren't having issues.

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#166
post #102

What I strongly believe is being overlooked here is not the fact that their 'liability math' has changed but the fact that this is the result of regional utility monopolies. The entire energy sector are allowed to operate in these terrible ways because they have local governments supporting their terrible business models. Price of energy hasn't gone down because there is no actual competition. Without these large gov…

And yet when you try deregulating it, you wind up with Enron. In my opinion, electricity needs to now become a government function. The more people install solar panels and batteries, the less profitable electricity is going to be. It's a death spiral eventually completely dominated by the fixed costs of keeping the network connected and enough electricity production in reserve rather than the variable costs of basel…

It pretty much is...the marketing folks can't talk with the distribution/transmission folks without SEC liaison...the whole industry is governed by NERC, split up into regional authorities...WEC, ERCOT, MISO, etc...I'm not sure what you mean by "when you try deregulating it..."...Who is deregulating it and where?

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#167

I used to think power outages we’re mainly a developing country problem, this definitely changes my understanding of the tiers of maturity of countries.

It's pretty common for rural areas in the U.S. to have power failures during storms. Maybe not in California, though?

Important context here is that there never was any storm.

Shutting power as winds approach hurricane force is very sensible. Here (bay area) this week, the forecast was for winds in the 30mph range with gusts into the 40s. Windy yes, but hardly a storm.

The kicker is the winds never arrived. PG&E shutdown was scheduled for noon Wednesday but there no wind at all. So they postponed it to 8pm. At 8pm, no wind either. No further news from PG&E. At 11pm they cut power. Still no wind (maybe gusting to 2mph). Overnight - no wind. Next morning - no wind.

Nature really called them out here to highlight it was purely a political move. PG&E postponed the shutdown a few times waiting for the wind but when it never arrived they shut power down anyway.

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#168
If you are trying to cut California's wildfire risk, increasing legal liability of its electric utility is about the dumbest place to put your leverage that anyone could imagine. California could turn its power grid off entirely and only make a small dent in overall fire risk over time. All that dry brush has to go away somehow, and nature has historically done it with fires (no PG&E necessary).

Despite massive wealth, the California government's slide into 3rd-world standards has been pretty fast.

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The numbers you've quoted, from page 7, are per MW mile, not per mile.

Thanks, that was a really quick check. And yeah, that would increase the costs markedly. (My initial thought on posting was that $30 billion would not be enough, though the first read of actual per-mile costs, neglecting per MW-mile, seemed to suggest otherwise.)

This PDF from Wisconsin puts the cost at $280k-390k/mi depending on the voltage of the line. They put the cost of underground transmission lines at $1.5M-2M/mi for the same voltages.

https://psc.wi.gov/Documents/Brochures/Under%20Ground%20Tran...

Re: ‘This Did Not Go Well’: Inside PG&E’s Blackout Control Room

#170

Is there not a technical solution to this? A side effect here will be people creating their own power systems. I have already had my power go off 4 times this year and now I am looking at solar panels, batteries, and a natural gas generator.

> a technical solution

Elevators and public transit instead of exurban sprawl out into the redwoods solves the issue completely.

The real problem is incentivizing people to make it happen.

Post reply on HN