Live data from Hacker News

Bullshit.js

mourner.github.io

71–80 of 132 posts

Re: Bullshit.js

#71

Desperately need this in academia. The academic literature is full of hyped-up phrasing. Probably safe to say the more hyped-up something is presented, the less novel it actually is.

Not wkth bullshit.js takes less than ever to understand and benefit from

Re: Bullshit.js

#72
post #13

One of my favorite reads that has helped me navigate this post fact society is the short essay “On Bullshit” by Harry Frankfurt. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit It truly nails down the argument that bullshitting is far more dangerous than lying. With the current political climate it helps make a lot more sense of the craziness.

A PDF of the same can be found here: https://uca.edu/honors/files/2018/10/frankfurt_on-bullshit.p...

Re: Bullshit.js

#73
post #52

A side note, browsers are making bookmarklets harder to use in the name of security. Making it possible for web sites to block bookmarklets via Content-Security-Policy.

I hate this. I rely on bookmarklets heavily in my workflow, and this really bothers me.

Re: Bullshit.js

#74
post #30
post #23

This made my day. On my startup ideas TODO list there is one PredictiveBullshitMeter that one day will warn you before clicking on a link if the target is full of bullshit. My motivation was terrible news article that appear regularly on Indian newspaper websites where they rehash the same pile of junk again and again to make it look like a full page length article/report. I was hoping for a quick number like a ratio…

I'd pay for this.

How much? We offer support.

Re: Bullshit.js

#75
post #52

A side note, browsers are making bookmarklets harder to use in the name of security. Making it possible for web sites to block bookmarklets via Content-Security-Policy.

I hate this. I rely on bookmarklets heavily in my workflow, and this really bothers me.

Let it go. The new standard is bookmarkletless

Re: Bullshit.js

#76

There seems to be some kind of error: I ran this on my forthcoming study of cow manure and it translated the whole thing into business speak.

It would actually be a great feature to also convert the word "bullshit" into a random keyword from the dictionary. This way you can run it twice and then generate brand new summary of the service.

The cool thing with this would be that after n iterations, where n % 2 == 0, you'd still get the same bullahit as output. Send this along with a hash/number indicating the position of each converted word in the dictionary, and you have a simple cipher thing.

Re: Bullshit.js

#77
post #24
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure I follow you since you can use a bookmarklet on any content, including your own.

I'd like to enter a URL or copy/paste text into a textarea and see the result. IIRC bookmarklets are terribly insecure (I'd have to carefully examine the source code, for example, before running this on my gmail.com).

I think there is bullshit support for that

Re: Bullshit.js

#78

Desperately need this in academia. The academic literature is full of hyped-up phrasing. Probably safe to say the more hyped-up something is presented, the less novel it actually is.

I haven't noticed that with computer vision papers, maybe it depends on the field? There is sometimes difficult to understand jargon but it's generally not gratuitous.

Re: Bullshit.js

#79

This is actually really useful. I just ran this as a sanity check on a long document I wrote, and it pointed out a bunch of lousy writing. Even better, it seems you can use it with the Hemingway App ( http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ ) as you're writing...

You mean, you pass the dictionary over your document and see how the document is too long-winded in a sense?

Yes, exactly. It points out phrases like "frequent and productive collaboration with," which would be better as "worked with," or "highly efficient execution," which could be simplified to "fast."

Re: Bullshit.js

#80

This is actually really useful. I just ran this as a sanity check on a long document I wrote, and it pointed out a bunch of lousy writing. Even better, it seems you can use it with the Hemingway App ( http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ ) as you're writing...

a more general such tool: http://proselint.com/
Post reply on HN