Live data from Hacker News

A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

github.com

321–330 of 614 posts

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, I'm sorry - I thought you were talking to me. You appear to be having a conversation with somebody else about government intervention.

Since “monopoly” has a legal meaning, what do you think the next step is when people on HN start talking about it?

Well being that I was talking about IE pre-2010 I guess the next step would be to reminisce... maybe hope not to repeat the mistakes of the past? What do you suggest?

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#322
post #299

I wonder if it's been on purpose or just, as always, their automatic algorithms being imposible to contest when they're wrong. Honestly, Google's (and general tech giants') willingness to let people's lives be caught in the cracks of their algorithms in their pursue for scalability scares me more than any ideology they could push. More and more, we're seeing developers and content creators being banned or demonetised…

> I wonder if it's been on purpose or just, as always, their automatic algorithms being imposible to contest when they're wrong. Further down the github issue, another person attempts to submit the same build recieving the same response. But then asks for clarification on the applicability to uBlock only to receive an excerpt from ToC bundling advice... Pretty sure this is not algorithmic. As the dev said they are be…

Indeed. A friend of mine used to work on YouTube's moderation team. Turns out a lot of the "algorithm" is actually humans, hiding behind the shield of automation.

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#323

It's time to switch to Firefox as my main web browser. It's faster and generally more efficient than Chrome plus it has the most important extensions. The most surprising thing is that the Android version of Firefox is excellent. So good that I switched from Chrome a few months ago when this expected news first dropped. No ads on mobile is awesome.

Firefox is really dying compared to Chrome but I honestly think this is going to cause it to rebound. People aren't going to be happy without uBlock and Ad Block... Google has been REALLY dropping the ball in the last 2-5 years. What's a NEW Google product that you actually like (that they didn't acquire)? They literally CAN NOT build new products that people like. ... all their hardware products suck. New things lik…

> Google has been REALLY dropping the ball in the last 2-5 years.

Nope, they're in the advertising biz now. They aren't so much "dropping the ball" as playing a ballgame (extremely well) that you dislike (because it's harmful and exploitative and destroys the tools you love).

They're just a new microsoft. Or since they're in a particular phase of that development, let's say a new M$. Embrace, extend, exploit.

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#324

It's time to switch to Firefox as my main web browser. It's faster and generally more efficient than Chrome plus it has the most important extensions. The most surprising thing is that the Android version of Firefox is excellent. So good that I switched from Chrome a few months ago when this expected news first dropped. No ads on mobile is awesome.

Anyone thinking of installing Firefox should check out the Multi-Account Containers addon. I'm pretty sure such functionality doesn't exist for Chrome, and it makes it possible to isolate different sites and logins from each other. It's one of the best reasons to switch to Firefox, in my opinion.

profiles is close. better in some ways (absolutely arbitrarily grouping), worse in others (not automatic, so user-error prone)

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#325
post #283

Have been using Firefox Nightly for few weeks as only browser. Rock solid. Can recommend few extensions - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/auto-tab-disc... - http://www.one-tab.com - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/multi-touch-z...

Why Nightly? It's not guaranteed to be rock solid.

I've been using it for a few years and it has been rock solid for me.

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#326

Edge on Chromium is a great browser! Been using it for three months now and am never going back. Also, while I am here, you should all be using a Pi Hole instead of uBlock Origin anyway. Much less detectable by sites, covers all of your devices... Seriously, spend the 1 hour it takes to set up the Pi Hole - you won’t regret it.

The Pi-Hole is literally DNS filtering - aka HOSTs file in hardware. Relying upon a security practice from almost 25 years ago is not really a good idea IMHO.

It’s better than nothing and also works on mobile devices with poor ad-blocking support, like the iPad and iPhone.

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#327

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most users still don't care about their browser. The main reason Chrome became so dominant is because: * Google search results nagged all users to install it for a better experience * bundled Chrome with countless free software downloads * it is the default browser on Android

Not only is it the default on Android, it is required by some apps, like gmail that all its links open in Chrome despite Firefox being default on my phone. It stinks of the monopolistic behavior MS was engaged in with IE back in the day.

If you go into Gmail's General Settings screen, you can uncheck "Open web links in Gmail". All the links I open in Gmail open directly in Firefox for me after doing that.

If I leave that box checked, it does use a web view that is "Powered by Firefox", but I always prefer to have it just open a new tab in my regular Firefox app.

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#328

I switched to Brave a few months ago because I knew that Google would have done exactly a move like this. People should simply stop using Chrome because there's not a single good reason left to use it. Once upon a time it used to advertise its complete adherence to web standards, but nowadays it has now become the new IE when it comes to breaking them. And from now on it'll do everything not to harm Google's core bus…

> People should simply stop using Chrome because there's not a single good reason left to use it. The convenience of being able to access your data between devices.

Firefox sync works great. It's e2e encrypted too.

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#329
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is your firefox using Webrender? Vanilla firefox is slower than chrome but WebRender is noticeably faster than chrome. Chrome on a 4K monitor slows down to a crawl, but WebRender handles it like a champ. It can be easily enabled with a flag.

If any firefox devs are reading this - Can you please make this a default? - Can you please fix text rendering on mobile? Sites like reddit render at desktop resolution on mobile screen, and there is no clear text sizing that works. With Chrome I just set my size option and move on with life.

We are working on making it default on more platforms, see https://arewewebrenderyet.com/

Re: A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web Store

#330

It's time to switch to Firefox as my main web browser. It's faster and generally more efficient than Chrome plus it has the most important extensions. The most surprising thing is that the Android version of Firefox is excellent. So good that I switched from Chrome a few months ago when this expected news first dropped. No ads on mobile is awesome.

Anyone thinking of installing Firefox should check out the Multi-Account Containers addon. I'm pretty sure such functionality doesn't exist for Chrome, and it makes it possible to isolate different sites and logins from each other. It's one of the best reasons to switch to Firefox, in my opinion.

I don't get why this lives in an extension. It's even advertised in the options, but requires downloading a separate component. Creating an awkward experience as what looks like a core feature lives in an external module. I imagine there is a non-zero number of users who look at containers then opt not to use it because of the download requirement.
Post reply on HN