https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_cau...
Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
11–20 of 241 posts
Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#12The main problem I see with this study is that it could be confounded by the fact that high air pollution areas have other problems too that could be causing the bad behaviour instead, like overcrowding, noise, frustration at slow traffic, etc.
Reminds me of one of the prototypical sociological study examples of correlation vs causation where something akin to icecream sales correlated highly with murder rates. The fact air pollution, in many cases, directly correlates with population density, make the results seem less surprising. It would be more interesting if less populated areas with high air pollution (perhaps near industrial plants, etc.) had a high…
Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#13Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#14https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_cau...
Somebody posts this every single time any statistical study is published, regardless of whether the study actually contains a claim or causation of not.
In this case, the link was to an article, not a study. The article clearly implies causation.
Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#15One would like to know for comparison what the magnitude of the effect of humidity and temperature is on violent crime. Those numbers are probably in the paper somewhere because the abstract mentions how they had to "address confounding variation between temperature and air pollution". It not being mentioned in the abstract makes me suspect that the effect of pollution on violent crime is probably rather small compared to the effect of weather on violent crime.
(Is there a positive correlation between people stating stupid banalities and violent crime? Probably there is, because people who parrot things like "Correlation does not imply causation" tend to get punched in the face. For the avoidance of doubt, that was a joke, not a veiled threat.)
EDIT: The last sentence of the abstract strikes me as highly questionable (though perhaps there's something in the paper to justify it). Just because there's a short-term correlation between pollution and violent crime doesn't mean that there will be a long-term correlation with a similar magnitude. In other words: if you reduce pollution globally over the next ten years people might just raise their expectations and be just as violent on the days on which pollution is relatively high as they were ten years previously.
Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reminds me of one of the prototypical sociological study examples of correlation vs causation where something akin to icecream sales correlated highly with murder rates. The fact air pollution, in many cases, directly correlates with population density, make the results seem less surprising. It would be more interesting if less populated areas with high air pollution (perhaps near industrial plants, etc.) had a high…
I'm sure https://xkcd.com/1138/ is relevant.
Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#17Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#18Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#19Re: Exposure to air pollution is linked to an increase in violent crime
#20Lead(Pb) in the air maybe?
Pretty well documented, don't have the citations handy though. It's been thoroughly discuss on HN.
Rudimentary citation