Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

thedrive.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 100 posts

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#41

Post by bcaa7f3a8bbc »

monocasa wrote: post #8

Check out this dude's patents: https://patents.google.com/?inventor=salvatore+pais&oq=salva... Laser augmented turbojet propulsion system Craft Using an Inertial Mass Reduction Device Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field Plasma Compression Fusion Device High frequency gravitational wave generator Piezoelectricity-induced Room Temperature Superconductor

If you search the U.S. Patent system, you can find a lot of crazy things, because the patent office never actually verifies them. Take everything you read in patents like this with a grain of salt. One example I've seen is a mind control patent circulated in the conspiracy community.

> by displaying special images using Visual Basic, the CRT will emit electromagnetic waves at specific frequencies corresponding to the images.

This is real, many side-channel attacks use these techniques, you can even broadcast amplitude-modulated radio.

> And if we emit EM waves of a certain frequencies, mind control is achieved. It even has some code!

Probably bullshit. Even if it's possible for EM waves to alter the mind, a CRT doesn't work well. But you can say that it's easier to mind control someone using the web page displayed on the CRT, which is technically electromagnetic waves...

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#42

Post by not_real_acct »

LoveDeathRobots wrote: post #38
not_real_acct wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Last week Rogan had Capt Fravor who was one of the alleged witnesses to the "tictac" video that the pentagon confirmed the legitimacy of 2 years ago. Worth watching if you're into this kind of thing. On Rogan's forum, I posted an explanation of how these Navy "UFOs" work. I've included a history of their progress and citations: https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/dfehjt/an_explana...

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/dfehjt/an_explana... > The US Navy has made it abundantly clear that they have this technology .. When motionless, the craft point their gravitational waveguides DOWN, which causes them to hover. OK then, tell us why they allowed two shuttles to explode rather than use this gravitational waveguide technology?

Because the technology was classified at the time.

In 2008, a CIA analyst named "Ron Pandolfi" signed off on the declassification of the technology in a documented that he signed, here : https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/gravwaves.pdf

Pandolfi testified before the senate in 1998 in regards to the Chinese stealing U.S. technology:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campf...

The US patent office rejected the Navy's patents initially, then signed off on them after the Navy protested that China was working on something similar. Details here : https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-g...

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#43

Post by rasz »

arthurcolle wrote: post #31
not_real_acct wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exopolitics wrote the following, which I agree with: "Given what we know about secret space programs developed by the US Navy and Air Force respectively, electromagnetic propulsion systems have been used for decades in several crafts that operate both in space and underwater. The reason why Dr. Pais chose not to mark the patent applications secret was that senior Navy officials have decided the time had come for the…

What secret space programs?

Moon base we took from Nazis.

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#44

Post by not_real_acct »

arthurcolle wrote: post #31
not_real_acct wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exopolitics wrote the following, which I agree with: "Given what we know about secret space programs developed by the US Navy and Air Force respectively, electromagnetic propulsion systems have been used for decades in several crafts that operate both in space and underwater. The reason why Dr. Pais chose not to mark the patent applications secret was that senior Navy officials have decided the time had come for the…

What secret space programs?

> What secret space programs?

Personally, I believe that the "UFO" seen by the Navy pilot Commander David Fravor was a Navy craft. I don't think it was extraterrestrial in origin.

Hence, "secret space programs."

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#45

Post by rasz »

deepnotderp wrote: post #14
monocasa wrote: post #8

Check out this dude's patents: https://patents.google.com/?inventor=salvatore+pais&oq=salva... Laser augmented turbojet propulsion system Craft Using an Inertial Mass Reduction Device Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field Plasma Compression Fusion Device High frequency gravitational wave generator Piezoelectricity-induced Room Temperature Superconductor

Just going off the titles, at least 1, 4 and 6 are possibly not bs. Laser augmented combustion is a thing, compression fusion like general fusion or first light fusion is a thing and if you use piezoelectricity to induce pressure, then at very high pressures some materials become superconductors near room temperature

Patenting potentially workable ideas using vague nonsense solutions in hopes on profiting if/when someone else makes them workable is pretty BS.

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#46

Post by willis936 »

rolph wrote: post #5

"If it can be achieved, nuclear fusion would be a massive improvement over fission in that it produces much lower levels of radioactive waste and greenhouse gases, does not require enriched nuclear material that could be used to produce weapons" thermonuclear weapons are fusion yield devices using fission to ignite a fusion fuel. a fusion bomb, or other such weapon is probably closer to production than fusion derived…

Well, sort of. Fusion in thermonuclear bombs is primarily used as a neutron source, rather than as a significant percentage of the yield. If you want more yield then you want more fission, which needs more neutrons. You could have many fission-fusion stages stacked matroska style to make an arbitrarily large yield thermonuclear bomb. See: doomsday weapons. Also see: Edward Teller.

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#47

Post by bcaa7f3a8bbc »

monocasa wrote: post #8

Check out this dude's patents: https://patents.google.com/?inventor=salvatore+pais&oq=salva... Laser augmented turbojet propulsion system Craft Using an Inertial Mass Reduction Device Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field Plasma Compression Fusion Device High frequency gravitational wave generator Piezoelectricity-induced Room Temperature Superconductor

> Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field

...like running a AC current in a piece of copper wire?

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#48

Post by pedrocr »

not_real_acct wrote: post #42
LoveDeathRobots wrote: post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/dfehjt/an_explana... > The US Navy has made it abundantly clear that they have this technology .. When motionless, the craft point their gravitational waveguides DOWN, which causes them to hover. OK then, tell us why they allowed two shuttles to explode rather than use this gravitational waveguide technology?

Because the technology was classified at the time. In 2008, a CIA analyst named "Ron Pandolfi" signed off on the declassification of the technology in a documented that he signed, here : https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/gravwaves.pdf Pandolfi testified before the senate in 1998 in regards to the Chinese stealing U.S. technology: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campf... The US patent office…

>In 2008, a CIA analyst named "Ron Pandolfi" signed off on the declassification of the technology in a documented that he signed, here : https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/gravwaves.pdf

That document says very clearly the technology is not feasible.

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#49

Post by BEEdwards »

starpilot wrote: post #34
monocasa wrote: post #8

Check out this dude's patents: https://patents.google.com/?inventor=salvatore+pais&oq=salva... Laser augmented turbojet propulsion system Craft Using an Inertial Mass Reduction Device Electromagnetic field generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field Plasma Compression Fusion Device High frequency gravitational wave generator Piezoelectricity-induced Room Temperature Superconductor

We need some crazy tech billionaire to fund development for a POC of one of these patents.

That none have should tell you something...

Re: Scientist Behind Navy's “UFO Patents” Filed One for a Compact Fusion Reactor

#50

Post by penagwin »

runjake wrote: post #37
not_real_acct wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Last week Rogan had Capt Fravor who was one of the alleged witnesses to the "tictac" video that the pentagon confirmed the legitimacy of 2 years ago. Worth watching if you're into this kind of thing. On Rogan's forum, I posted an explanation of how these Navy "UFOs" work. I've included a history of their progress and citations: https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/dfehjt/an_explana...

I'm not going to refute your post, as I can't think of anything more plausible. But, I will mention that flying a Navy aircraft dangerously close to other military aircraft -- especially between aircraft in formation is aside from being highly-dangerous, is highly-frowned upon, and highly unprofessional. I don't see US military flight crews taking this risk, even if they are piloting "black" aircraft. I don't see thi…

I was thinking the same thing. The only other thought was they were testing to see if our own procedures could detect the craft?

But then I would have expected the crews who saw it to be quickly hushed - not publicly talking about it.

Post reply on HN