Live data from Hacker News

Ken Thompson's Unix Password

leahneukirchen.org

71–80 of 665 posts

Re: Ken Thompson's Unix Password

#71
post #23

I'm shocked at how well the old hashing stood up; sure, it's totally crackable today, but a well-picked password still took 4+ days to crack on modern hardware, which is remarkable. (Granted, it doesn't sound like they did anything fancy like throwing a hundred cloud instances at it or something; I'm not saying you should use DES today:) )

30 years ago I cracked everyone’s Unix password on an old Sun computer. It didn’t take long because everyone had a password that was in the dictionary. Needless to say, people were not happy with the messenger.

That's funny - I was going to post that I was first exposed to this thirty years ago when my password was cracked on an old Sun computer! I didn't complain, it was a wake up call. (You weren't at OUCS were you?)

Re: Ken Thompson's Unix Password

#73
>Did he really use uppercase letters or even special chars? (A 7-bit exhaustive search would still take over 2 years on a modern GPU.)

>took 4+ days on an AMD Radeon Vega64

I don't understand. The author first claims that it would take 2 years on a modern GPU to brute force a 7 bit password with special characters but then he is helped by Nigel Williams that cracked it on 4 days on an AMD Radeon Vega64

Did Nigel Williams used a better technique? Is AMD Radeon Vega64 much faster than a "modern GPU"? Did the author overstimated the difficulty?

Re: Ken Thompson's Unix Password

#77
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is the beginning of the closed game, which is what the article says. Seems like a vacuous nitpick.

Not if you play chess. 1. d4 is played probably more than half the time in professional games. It can lead to lots of different openings, closed and open (but not at the same time).

> (but not at the same time)

Nice reference.

Post reply on HN