Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are just theorizing that #2 is happening with no evidence.
The evidence is that they didn't support the original tweet that caused all the ruckus, and there hasn't been a flood of tweets or other expressions of support for HK by other NBA people since the NBA made the statement.
NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
411–420 of 477 posts
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#412This reminds me of a story a teacher of mine told in a Advertising class, about a retailer that put pressure on a soda maker to lower prices, or they wouldn't give them share of shelf. Well the soda maker didn't agree, so they pulled the inventory out. Weeks later the retailer came back to invite them in at the same rates. Apparently the customers weren't happy that their favorite soda wasn't available, and made sure…
I want to point it out it is not only Chinese government, but also Chinese people, the people were enjoying the NBA, are abandoning it. This actually hurts the feeling of the fans.
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#413free speech, but don't build it another people's feelings, think about the Clipper's, if NBA don't do it, someone will do it. There's more on basketball than NBA.
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#414For all you kids, do you know what happens in Hongkong? Don't just use "protest", check some video from the other side. Look for Molotov cocktails, punching innocent people, burning stores, ruining public services, threaten policeman's families, does any of these seem OK for you all? If you don't see those stuff, the most easy one is searching for police shooting, how did that shoot happen? What happened right after…
Oh except for that punching innocent people thing, which is bad. I like how you snuck that one in there.
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#415Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They have nothing to lose but incremental profits and in the long run China will lose. I don’t understand this. They could lost all their market in China which is not a small number and in return, long-term financially, nothing. It is not like Chinese people can’t live without it. There are more than enough entertainments for Chinese people to enjoy.
At the rate they're making money (NBA), why does ADDITIONAL PROFIT matter ? We aren't 'the ferangi'; people are more important than profits, but American corporations seem to have ignored or forgotten that. Screw NBA market share, or financial well-being. Democracy and human rights are vastly more important!
Tell me, what's the definition of a terrorist? Morey is smart, he has nothing to lose, he has successfully kidnapped NBA to protect him, he got enough support from politicians, he will have a bright future in politics, who cares about NBA?
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#416The NBA really needs to grow a spine on this one. They have nothing to lose but incremental profits and in the long run China will lose. It will just be one more reminder for the populace that their current government restricts them from luxuries the rest of the world gets to experience. And if that doesn't bother them, good riddance I guess, it's not like China is going to come up with their own basketball league th…
Even if they did, so what? There's certainly room in the world for quite a few basketball leagues.
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#417Earlier quoted context omitted.
Basketball is popular in China. The NBA is the premier league. It doesn't need China. If you want to see the best or play with the best, it will be the NBA. If the CCP (China Communist Party) wants to spoil the entertainment of the citizenry, that's their problem. The NBA can go right back into China whenever the winds change. On the other hand, if the NBA doesn't stand up to China, a large part of their core audienc…
This is another thing I feel uneasy about, this is just a basketball league, why does it have to force people to pick a side?
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#418Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean? Adam Silver wrote a statement supporting Morey's right to free speech, and then doubled down on it after receiving flak for his free speech support.
I think the point was the NBA needs to take a stance on HK itself, in support of democracy. "We support free speech" is a cop-out, because China is happy for you to support free speech, as long as you don't say anything they don't like. It would be a stronger stance to say, "Actually, we think Morey was right", especially if it's going to cost them money to do so.
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#419Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm also a fan of SerpentZA, LaoWhy86, and their shared channel ADVChina. Same thing as your link, guys that have been living there for over 10 years, married to chinese women, read and speak the language, and can provide a lot of insight into not only every day life, but also the views of chinese people within mainland china.
I agree, however they have had quite a distinct change in tone recently since leaving China. Not that what they say is untrue, but it feels at least somewhat to have an "unfair" anti-China bias at this point, at least to me. The reality is though, no singular opinion is "correct", best to consume a wide variety of opinions with an open mind, and resist forming any strong conclusions about particulars. Usually, the co…
Re: NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels game broadcasts
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
Billionaire's shouldn't exist. Name literally one benefit of having a billionaire in our society. Any one thing we wouldn't otherwise have.
I csn’t think of one benefit of you existing either.
If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future.