They can bite me as well. This a foreign nation exerting its will over our politics via economic control. The govt should make strides to curb this imo.
Hello pot, let me introduce you to kettle.
US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
91–100 of 121 posts
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#92I remember when news used to tell you about things that did happen instead of things that might happen. Until a company actually does this, this is just clickbait speculation.
Does Blizzard's muzzling/suspension of a Hearthstone tournament player count? Sure, the player isn't an employee, but essentially earns money by playing. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21190265
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#93In two words: bite me. there aren't too many things that i'm a raving aboslutist about, but the freedom of political speech is one of them. If my employer attempts to step on my neck for saying things about china that china doesn't like, on my time, and my personal accounts, their next contact from me will be from an ACLU lawyer.
While I agree with your general sentiment, free speech absolutism is meaningless in employment settings without something like militant labor organizing to defend it. It’s not protected in many cases and they can always just fire you and exhaust your resources in any resulting legal battle. If you had a union on the other hand, it could stipulate protection of this kind of speech as part of the employment contract an…
Sounds an awful lot like a socialist euphemism for an ideologically-motivated blend of censorship.
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
Relevant XKCD from way back in 2006: https://www.xkcd.com/137/
He has since changed his mind: https://xkcd.com/1357/
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#95Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
Badass move from a badass man with a badass name. I can't seem to find any indication that it actually happened, though. You happen to have a source? I'd love to read more about the badass that is The Hogg.
https://www.newsweek.com/cathay-ceo-refused-name-hong-kong-p... https://www.ibtimes.com/cathay-pacific-ceo-praised-not-givin...
> One of the first netizens to share this news, David Ng, a student at the Education University of Hong Kong, told Taiwan News that this information came from a trusted source who works as a manager for Cathay Pacific Airways
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is Russia (the country) is poor . While China is not. Russia's GDP is about 2017USD$ 1.7 T. China's is 2017USD$ 12.2 T. Companies traditionally aren't in the habit of doing favors for inconsequential entities. And for non-energy multinationals, Russia is generally more trouble than it's worth.
China pop is 1.417 bil, Russia's population is 144 million. GDP/person: China $8,609, Russia $11,805. It's complicated to compare these two countries. China has a much larger economy so they have a bigger pool of money to spend, but then they have less per person. But both countries have huge poor groups.
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
>problem only when the consequence is brought on you by the government It's not that corporations (or individuals) are seen as being naturally good. But they don't have the power to imprison you or silence you by force and, in fact, would be committing a crime by doing so. They have some civil remedies for stealing trade secrets or breaching NDAs. Certainly major corporations have a lot of power. But it is still a fu…
> But they don't have the power to imprison you or silence you by force The ability to fire you and give scathing negative references to any prospective future employers (thus in turn eradicating one's ability to participate in a market-driven economy/society) is just as severe of a penalty, and imposing that penalty for the purposes of silencing political dissent is just as reprehensible. We're (hopefully) critical…
Even if you did infuriate your neighbors to the point where the guy at the general store wouldn't deal with you - you could pick up and move somewhere else, not even that far away, and it would all be fine.
That's absolutely not the case today. If you get hit by the wrong company, you can be denied the right to participate in swaths of society. And no matter where you go, they're there. You can't get away. Their power extends throughout the country, and often outside of it too.
And as society changed in this manner, we've done nothing to ensure our freedoms remain protected. We've mostly thrown up our hands and decided by default that it was okay because at least the government wasn't doing it - even though corporations hold just as much power to make your life absolutely miserable. It seems a little silly to point out they can't arrest you - oh, sure, not directly, but they can do a whole lot to you short of that, and they can go a long way towards getting you arrested.
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
He has since changed his mind: https://xkcd.com/1357/
Doesn't sound like he did at all. The first cartoon states that you should have the right to say everything you feel you should say, while the second states that no one is forced to listen to you.
Re: US workers may have to change social media use as firms adapt to China's rules
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
He has since changed his mind: https://xkcd.com/1357/
Doesn't sound like he did at all. The first cartoon states that you should have the right to say everything you feel you should say, while the second states that no one is forced to listen to you.