South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
31–40 of 248 posts
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're also a big proponent of bothsideism. For some topics that makes sense (because there are two legitimate or legitimately absurd sides). For other topics it just pollutes discourse by elevating an illegitimate side.
"I like the style when it fits my beliefs, but this comedy show is polluting discourse when I disagree with it"
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#33I'm amazed at how South Park after 23 seasons can make me laugh out loud repeatedly while combining classic south parkisms with hilarious satire of current events. I'm a big south park fan and these 2 episodes so far have been on point.
Trey and Matt manage to stay relevant in ways that other shows can't. I appreciate their work.
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#34Please explain like I'm five. What's the social status of SP in the USA? E.g. what do Chomsky, Obama, Trump, Chelsea Clinton, Fox news think about it? How come there are no rage firings because of it?
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#35I'm not a South Park fan, but that ban got my interested so I watched the episode (Yeah, that episode is banned in China and few "reposter"s has been warned for posting South Park related contents). Few days ago, a guy been sent to jail for 7 days because he was complaining the National Day military parade, saying something like "A civilized nation turn machine into soldier; a rouge nation turn soldier into machine".…
What are you saying? What is your point?
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#36Please explain like I'm five. What's the social status of SP in the USA? E.g. what do Chomsky, Obama, Trump, Chelsea Clinton, Fox news think about it? How come there are no rage firings because of it?
People are used to it and don't care about it anymore.
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're also a big proponent of bothsideism. For some topics that makes sense (because there are two legitimate or legitimately absurd sides). For other topics it just pollutes discourse by elevating an illegitimate side.
"I like the style when it fits my beliefs, but this comedy show is polluting discourse when I disagree with it"
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#38Please explain like I'm five. What's the social status of SP in the USA? E.g. what do Chomsky, Obama, Trump, Chelsea Clinton, Fox news think about it? How come there are no rage firings because of it?
Most people recognize SP as libertarian in general orientation, with a slight liberal bias.
Neither Obama nor Trump has spent a second in office thinking about its portrayal of them.
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#39i wonder if China has copied SP and if so how they would portray the USA. Has anything been made like this? And is it just as funny?
Re: South Park Responds to Being Banned in China for “Band in China”
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not saying they don't have a political leaning, but they often focus their energy and 22 minutes on showing just how wildly absurd a situation is. For me, that's a big ingredient in why they've stayed so entertaining.
They're also a big proponent of bothsideism. For some topics that makes sense (because there are two legitimate or legitimately absurd sides). For other topics it just pollutes discourse by elevating an illegitimate side.
I don't think "bothsideism" exist, the act itself is just a cover up for political opinions. What the accusation of "bothsideism" is actually saying is "you are actually not neutral, but biased". But SP never claimed to be a political neutral medium. It is just some opinionated comedy series that some people enjoys.