Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm afraid that people able to save for retirement are less and less average these days ?
This report says that 1 in 5 have saved less than $5000 for retirement, which means that 4 in 5 have a substantial retirement investment. Although there is a big problem brewing (1/5th of all Americans is a huge number of people), those who would stand a lot to lose if something went wrong in the financial world are still the majority. https://news.northwesternmutual.com/planning-and-progress-20...
World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
41–50 of 54 posts
Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#42Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm afraid that people able to save for retirement are less and less average these days ?
This report says that 1 in 5 have saved less than $5000 for retirement, which means that 4 in 5 have a substantial retirement investment. Although there is a big problem brewing (1/5th of all Americans is a huge number of people), those who would stand a lot to lose if something went wrong in the financial world are still the majority. https://news.northwesternmutual.com/planning-and-progress-20...
Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#44This is probably due in part to private investors asking their banks to invest their money for them without regard to environmental issues. Will you blame the postal office for delivering a bomb if it's properly packaged ? Probably not. The same way, I feel it's stupid to blame the banks for investing their customers' money where the yield is the largest when that is specifically what the customers' expect. Put huge…
If the package has been labelled "bomb", I would blame them. And that's the point here, they know what it's going to be invested in. Yes, it's commercially imperative to trade, unless it doesn't. And people getting aware of it and complaining is one way, it becomes more of a liability.
The end result: the people who made the call for the long term good won't be around to actually see it implemented.
The problem needs to be fixed in a broader scope. The entire corporate incentive structure is broken.
Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#45https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=38572
https://www.synapse-energy.com/sites/default/files/SynapsePa...
Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
This report says that 1 in 5 have saved less than $5000 for retirement, which means that 4 in 5 have a substantial retirement investment. Although there is a big problem brewing (1/5th of all Americans is a huge number of people), those who would stand a lot to lose if something went wrong in the financial world are still the majority. https://news.northwesternmutual.com/planning-and-progress-20...
More than $5000 is not a substantial amount
Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#47Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
More than $5000 is not a substantial amount
Maybe not to someone who has a million dollars, but $10,000 to someone who has $10,000 is 100% of their net worth. "People are not saving enough for retirement" and "people would get significantly hurt if their retirement savings were damaged" are not contradictory statements.
Disclaimer: 1-1.5% would make a big difference over time
Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#49The 410(k) can exist and guarantee returns because of things like fossil fuel financing. Over the past several generations, resources have been funneled into railways, roads, extraction technologies, refineries, fleets, grids, etc. This infrastructure has been established for some time now and continues to grow, but perhaps at a reduced rate because emissions now appear to be a threat. Sudden regulation to the end of the drastic reduction of fossil fuel deployment is not compatible with the expected economic growth that has established people's desires and standards for an idyllic life.
The surplus generated by the energy density, abundance, and accessibility of fossil fuels is the reason the aging citizen can anticipate monthly pension deposits or dividends sufficient enough to keep them well fed, housed, traveling, and medically sound. It is a comfortable method of living out the final years of a life spent participating in an economy that can now serve them as a reward for their service to it.
The necessary large scale transistion to emissionless renewables interrupts long term structured and predictable payment plans on the very grids and refineries that have granted us financial security.
Re: World's top banks pour $1.9T into fossil fuel financing since 2015
#50The headline itself commands attention because it suggests a target to offload blame upon amidst this ongoing climate change narrative. But how many of us manage our own retirement fund (day-to-day)? The 410(k) can exist and guarantee returns because of things like fossil fuel financing. Over the past several generations, resources have been funneled into railways, roads, extraction technologies, refineries, fleets,…