Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t know if the religious affiliation impacts anything about the quality of coverage, does it? But I get not wanting to sign something you don’t endorse or believe in. If this model is successful for religious folks, it seems an alternative could be made for hackers or any other group.
Well historically religious organizations have resisted providing adequate coverage for women’s health. So yes, religious affiliation often does impact the quality of coverage.
Fair enough. I’m curious to see — one of my friends is big into women’s health and she recommended it.