This recent trend of taking down past figures because they do not meet current criteria for acceptable behavior in society is disturbing. It's like people are trying to erase lessons from the past.
This is hardly recent. I remember hearing this exact conversation about Gandhi at least 25 years ago.
Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
41–50 of 74 posts
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#42This recent trend of taking down past figures because they do not meet current criteria for acceptable behavior in society is disturbing. It's like people are trying to erase lessons from the past.
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the difference between discussing and 'taking down'? Is there any way to talk about this without disturbing you, or would you rather that this topic not be discussed at all?
Well, they literally took down a statue of Gandhi. I wonder if we just won't be able to have statues any more? Or, we can only have statues of people whose lives are largely inscrutable or unknown to the public.
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#44The Gandhi Nobody Knows
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-gandhi-nobod...
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#45This historical revisionism is so absurd. It expects people to be isolated from their social context.
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gandhi already didn't meet the criteria for acceptable behavior during his lifetime though. It's just that people didn't know.
Such a person is always a person of extremes. The past just allowed for things to be hidden more then they can be now. > Gandhi already didn't meet the criteria for acceptable behavior during his lifetime though. That is always a matter of context. If you ask the British at the time no aspect of his met the criteria of acceptable behavior.
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gandhi already didn't meet the criteria for acceptable behavior during his lifetime though. It's just that people didn't know.
Such a person is always a person of extremes. The past just allowed for things to be hidden more then they can be now. > Gandhi already didn't meet the criteria for acceptable behavior during his lifetime though. That is always a matter of context. If you ask the British at the time no aspect of his met the criteria of acceptable behavior.
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their failings don't remove their achievements. In the case of Gandhi it's not just the current criteria. Even during his time people saw him as a shitty person. It's good that we stop worshiping great men. Rabindranath Tagore saw him as a nihilist with fierce joy of annihilation. Many Dalits (untouchables) saw Gandhi as the enemy. While he worked alongside them in some aspects, he was patronizing towards them. Ambed…
This is one of the TILs that I could gladly have skipped. I mean, sometimes you'd rather have a wrong, but more peaceful picture of the world, than live with the impression that literally everyone out has a very dark side to them...
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#49either way his development of non-violent resistance is still invaluable
Re: Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, but His Attitudes on Race and Sex Are Under Scrutiny
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their failings don't remove their achievements. In the case of Gandhi it's not just the current criteria. Even during his time people saw him as a shitty person. It's good that we stop worshiping great men. Rabindranath Tagore saw him as a nihilist with fierce joy of annihilation. Many Dalits (untouchables) saw Gandhi as the enemy. While he worked alongside them in some aspects, he was patronizing towards them. Ambed…
This is one of the TILs that I could gladly have skipped. I mean, sometimes you'd rather have a wrong, but more peaceful picture of the world, than live with the impression that literally everyone out has a very dark side to them...
You can't weigh person by subtracting the negative from positive. Gandhi was still a great man despite his failings.