Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 47 posts

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

#13
post #11

I honestly don't get why people use Atom or even VS code for that matter. Vim and emacs come shipped with many systems, have good plugins, and are waaaay faster; not to mention no telemetry!

Because they have a steep learning curve, were not designed with guis in mind and require extensive customization.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

#14
I value a technically inferior alternative insofar as it provides an "out" from a corporate entity. Sadly, using Firefox doesn't really mitigate Google's grip on my data since I'm still searching via the big G. I don't see the point of Atom as it's also Microsoft-bound, identical to vscode in ethos, and as you point out, gets far fewer man-hours of development. I am an emacs user.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

#15
The thing that drives me batty with both of these Electron editors is that it is apparently not possible to pop out a child window for one file without launching another whole instance.

As somebody that grew up with Windows when MDI was all the rage, it is weird that this doesn't work.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

#16
post #11

I honestly don't get why people use Atom or even VS code for that matter. Vim and emacs come shipped with many systems, have good plugins, and are waaaay faster; not to mention no telemetry!

I'm a vim user for a lot of things, but there's some things that are just not as good. For example, auto-completion is definitely better in VS Code or Atom. Although, vim is improving in this respect with things like coc.nvim, they are still a _nightmare_ to setup.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

#17

I value a technically inferior alternative insofar as it provides an "out" from a corporate entity. Sadly, using Firefox doesn't really mitigate Google's grip on my data since I'm still searching via the big G. I don't see the point of Atom as it's also Microsoft-bound, identical to vscode in ethos, and as you point out, gets far fewer man-hours of development. I am an emacs user.

> Sadly, using Firefox doesn't really mitigate Google's grip on my data since I'm still searching via the big G

That's rather easy to fix.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

#18

I value a technically inferior alternative insofar as it provides an "out" from a corporate entity. Sadly, using Firefox doesn't really mitigate Google's grip on my data since I'm still searching via the big G. I don't see the point of Atom as it's also Microsoft-bound, identical to vscode in ethos, and as you point out, gets far fewer man-hours of development. I am an emacs user.

https://www.startpage.com/en/pics.html

Not a perfect solution but does allow some cake and eating it too.

Re: Ask HN: What Happened to GitHub's Atom?

#20
post #11

I honestly don't get why people use Atom or even VS code for that matter. Vim and emacs come shipped with many systems, have good plugins, and are waaaay faster; not to mention no telemetry!

I'm a vim user for a lot of things, but there's some things that are just not as good. For example, auto-completion is definitely better in VS Code or Atom. Although, vim is improving in this respect with things like coc.nvim, they are still a _nightmare_ to setup.

Ever tried YouCompleteMe? I love it for Ruby, Python, JavaScript.
Post reply on HN