Earlier quoted context omitted.
He got a scholarship to Eton and then one to Oxford. They don’t give those out with the papers, even to rich kids. We can say he is very bright without any qualification.
We can say he leveraged his privilege well, and I think that's different than offering someone blanket praise of being "bright". And again, I'm not necessarily making judgement on his academic credentials - I made the point about his jobs . Of which a classical education is evidently rather worthless. With the exception of being a player of politics and narratives.
The guy who was editor of the Spectator, and a wildly successful columnist and speaker?