While fascinating, if this is a deliberate strategy, I wonder what its intended effect is supposed to be. Are people curious enough to google for stories about Johnson's alleged affair with the American woman going to be satisfied with the "model of restraint" quote? Are they going to forget what they have just been searching for, get immediately distracted and go read what this model of restraint business is all abo…
No, but it makes the alleged affair look a lot less important. If a news story is not even on the first page of google results, is it even that big of a deal ?
Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
261–270 of 290 posts
Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#262Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#263At first I read it backwards, I thought he had had sex with a model just to hide a scandal about a "model of restraint" and thought " wow, that guy is really doing all he can to hide the scandal". And then I remembered it was not France and having an affair could be a scandal, and I'm a little disappointed because I preferred my version.
To be fair, the affair is only the scandal because it may have caused a conflict of interest. Boris has had plenty of them in the past, to the point where nobody knows for certain how many children he has.
On a side note, someone personal life choices has no impact on their work as politicians so that kind of "scandal" are not that big of a deal in France. It only increase the sales of gossip magazines.
Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#264Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#265Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The thing is in this case, Boris has been caught red-handed doing very similar sorts of "cunning disguised as idiocy" ploys before. For example, feigning forgetting speeches. Seems hard to blame him for this. Compare https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/UnaccustomedAsIA... .
I don't blame him, really. I find it quite clever. But I think it's silly to deny it and act like all apparent instances of it are baseless conspiracy theories.
Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#266Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#267See also "Boris Johnson & Kippers" [1] ("kipper" is a nickname for a member of UKIP, a right-wing pro-Brexit political party) He was talking about buses on the radio again this morning, as was Sajid Javid, the chancellor, yesterday. [1] https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/boris-johnson-kippers...
Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#268As an aside, these are the kinds of things that people worry about, when they worry about (ML) algorithms “overfitting” to a particular proxy target/metric.
Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
> you can't deny that Johnson is much smarter than he wants us to think. In playing the political game at least, definitely so. Lots of reports from coworkers (especially from the Foreign Office) that he is genuinely as clueless as he comes across when it comes to other elements of his job.
The news story that really made me believe that the bumbling fool shtick is real and not just an act was when he went to a buddhist temple in Myanmar and started reciting a colonial-era Kipling poem about a British soldier reminiscing about a Burmese girl that he kissed - until the ambassador intervened and told him it wasn't appropriate. If he understood the context of the poem (a lack of sensitivity to the three wa…
Re: Boris Johnson uses search terms in interviews to hide negative articles?
#270Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've borrowed it from someone else (who was actually educated in Oxford, but not Eton), wish it were my own though.
For centuries a posh accent and certainty was enough for the class that ruled the UK. One thing Brexit has successfully done is illustrate to all sides just how mediocre our leadership actually is. Mediocre leaders are fine when the ship is sailing in calm waters to a known destination. At the moment it feels like half of them want to steer into the iceberg and the other half want to abandon ship, with a few lone voi…
Though, there are opportunists. Like Mao. Or Hitler.