Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just for the sake of feedback, I found your post confusing. It's not really clear to me what you are saying exactly.
Presumably, this person is airing frustration with common responses to privacy oriented discussions he or she has experienced as participant and/or vicariously. He or she has characterized them ending in ad homenims, whereby the privacy minded individual is construed as politically or intellectually unmoored, similar to Alex Jones. Spedru posits the covert and exposed deviants within companies, that we've exchanged o…
That implies there's an uncharitable characterization. What would that be?