Question: how many of these are standardized? I'm not particularly interested in adding a bunch of specific, proprietary tags…
Then again were all slaves to the whims of Alphabet and Facebooks for traffic.
51–60 of 129 posts
Question: how many of these are standardized? I'm not particularly interested in adding a bunch of specific, proprietary tags…
Then again were all slaves to the whims of Alphabet and Facebooks for traffic.
Please no. IMO this makes most pages unusable on mobile. Most websites, e.g. news websites with long-form articles, shouldn't be using mobile pages / responsive design / zoomed-in layout at all. Web apps (Twitter, GMail), maybe. But most mobile pages are far more unusable than desktop versions (looking at you, Facebook and Reddit).
But, I also have no problem with Facebook's mobile site, so maybe I just don't see the same problems as you are seeing.
> The above 2 meta tags must come first in the to consistently ensure proper document rendering. It looks like they don't follow their own advice:
Does anybody remember that funny thread where some dev here was saying "who calls it HTML5 anymore" as if everyone else was out of touch with stagnating irrelevant skills that would immediately throw red flags during a phone screen? It just gave me a chuckle thinking about it Thanks for the guide!
Uh... what do people call "it" now-a-days? Serious
sure, I've heard that context too
> The above 2 meta tags must come first in the to consistently ensure proper document rendering. It looks like they don't follow their own advice:
Do what they say, not what they do! maximum-scale has only three valid uses: 1. extreme values, like 5.0, if a browser misdetects that zooming that far is useful when it isn't (rare) 2. pure-app websites like maps or video games that have alternative scaling arrangements and browser pinch-zoom gets in the way. 3. there is no number three, and the thing you are thinking of is incorrect. maximum-scale is an automatic u…
OMG, I thought how much money is this company losing because their website intentionally disables a built in feature!?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> maximum-scale is an automatic usability and accessibility fail I wish more people realized this. As somebody that's visually impaired, it makes mobile browsing quite painful for me.
just out of curiousity, how do you deal with this problem in native apps where pinch zoom is disabled?
Instead we find many of those tags (title, description, author, etc.) hidden behind the namespace of some corporations.
Question: how many of these are standardized? I'm not particularly interested in adding a bunch of specific, proprietary tags…
I'd go by W3 https://www.w3schools.com/html/html_head.asp Then again were all slaves to the whims of Alphabet and Facebooks for traffic.
ICBM tag with targeting coordinates hmm
tl;dr you should not expect to actually be targeted with an ICBM unless you foolishily also include elevation information.