Live data from Hacker News

Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

beebom.com

91–100 of 151 posts

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#91
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Call me paranoid but it seems increasingly that Big Tech uses all their avenues to force conformity. The message is that if you don't do what we want, bad things start happening. It can happen anytime anywhere and you wont necessarily know why. It's about encouraging a helpless, submissive, fearful mentality. Maybe they'll no longer show you as verified. Maybe your posts will be demoted a bit in the feed. Maybe you n…

Just using private browsing and UBO makes you see more reCaptchas from google and sites using it

Or to paraphrase: Company getting vast majority of its money from advertising and tracking, actively hampers experience of people who block advertising and trackers.

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#92
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When will Twitter re-open verifying? It's been closed for 2 years...

Crummy Buzzfeed content drones with 5000 followers are getting verified. Verification ticks are just a badge of being well connected, and approved. And having your tick removed is a way of saying that you have stepped out of line.

That's what worries me about verified. It's just a form of nepotism at the end of the day and they certainly prefer certain niches (Hollywood, Silicon Valley, the media industry, etc..) over others.

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#93

> Links asking someone to add you on another service aren’t supported on Instagram That's some weasel-wording right there. "Not supported" makes it sound like this is a feature they'd need to code that they haven't gotten around to yet. It's not -- they needed to take the time to explicitly block something that would otherwise work by default. Phrasing it as "Links asking someone to add you on another service are not…

Isn't inviting folks to add you on another service how most of the scam / paid date etc folks operate? I used to get messages from random women asking me to add them on other services a fair bit.

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#94

Removing links to other platforms is anti-competitive full stop. Threatening de-verification due to links is even worse. This is the behavior of monopolists. The FTC and existing anti-trust organizations would do well to return to their jobs and take a look at these practices broadly across the tech industry.

I think most of the scam / paid date / etc folks ask you to add them on other platforms. I guess this will now be permitted "full stop"?

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#95

> Links asking someone to add you on another service aren’t supported on Instagram That's some weasel-wording right there. "Not supported" makes it sound like this is a feature they'd need to code that they haven't gotten around to yet. It's not -- they needed to take the time to explicitly block something that would otherwise work by default. Phrasing it as "Links asking someone to add you on another service are not…

Isn't inviting folks to add you on another service how most of the scam / paid date etc folks operate? I used to get messages from random women asking me to add them on other services a fair bit.

Sure. (I mean, probably; I'm not an expert.) And if Instagram came out and said that that was not allowed then this point would be moot. The objection (in this subthread) isn't that they're banning the behavior, it's that they're being dishonest about it.

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#96

> Links asking someone to add you on another service aren’t supported on Instagram That's some weasel-wording right there. "Not supported" makes it sound like this is a feature they'd need to code that they haven't gotten around to yet. It's not -- they needed to take the time to explicitly block something that would otherwise work by default. Phrasing it as "Links asking someone to add you on another service are not…

Isn't inviting folks to add you on another service how most of the scam / paid date etc folks operate? I used to get messages from random women asking me to add them on other services a fair bit.

Even assuming that's a valid reason to restrict a competitor, the phrasing is still deceptive.

If Instagram stands by their decision to block third-party links, then they should phrase it as, "we block third-party links", not "they're not currently supported."

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#97
post #86
post #7

This “verified” nonsense is silly. Twitter knew who Assange was but refused to “verify” him. They should change what they call verified to another label like “goodie two-shoes” instead. As it is is a complete misnomer. It’s basically used to get users to behave a certain way and if they don’t conform they don’t get verified or if they are verified it gets revoked.

Consider also https://twitter.com/AlbertEinstein It's not a long-dead scientist, but is still verified as such.

It says it’s managed by his estate—it seems fine to me?

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#98
post #12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Alternatively “top revenue generator, except where we disagree with them, except when we make special exceptions”.

To me it means "person full of their own self importance".

That might be necessary, but it's not sufficient; there are many users who are not "verified" who are very convinced of their own importance;)

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#99

> Links asking someone to add you on another service aren’t supported on Instagram That's some weasel-wording right there. "Not supported" makes it sound like this is a feature they'd need to code that they haven't gotten around to yet. It's not -- they needed to take the time to explicitly block something that would otherwise work by default. Phrasing it as "Links asking someone to add you on another service are not…

Isn't inviting folks to add you on another service how most of the scam / paid date etc folks operate? I used to get messages from random women asking me to add them on other services a fair bit.

>paid date

Well that's one way to phrase it.

Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content

#100
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't instagram participation voluntary and free of charge? Monopoly over what? Everyone is free to move to another platform or start his own.

> participation voluntary and free of charge If you want distribution of your thoughts, you have to use the walled garden controlled by giants. > Everyone is free to move to another platform or start his own. The reality is that you can't. Not without billions of dollars of funding. Social networks should be regulated. They can't own the platform and make moves to crush others by threatening to downgrade your voice a…

I distribute my thoughts using email. I have not hit it's scalability limits yet. I cry when I think that in some future I will have to be under some proprietary platform control to distribute my thoughts.

> The reality is that you can't.

The reality is that is was solved a while ago, the solution is rss and email.

Instagram instead offers popularity and nice photo filters and colored ticks on avatars. Which are nothing in common with distributing thoughts.

Post reply on HN