I wonder if all the articles talking about the prevalence of microplastics, are in actuality demonstrating the safety of microplastics. If it is in 93% of bottled water, and bottled water is used by millions of people (according to https://www.consumerreports.org/bottled-water/should-we-brea... around 110 Million people in the US avoid drinking tap water), then there has been widespread exposure to microplastics. It…
Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
11–20 of 383 posts
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#12I wonder if all the articles talking about the prevalence of microplastics, are in actuality demonstrating the safety of microplastics. If it is in 93% of bottled water, and bottled water is used by millions of people (according to https://www.consumerreports.org/bottled-water/should-we-brea... around 110 Million people in the US avoid drinking tap water), then there has been widespread exposure to microplastics. It…
These articles are providing easily-digestible imagery for how wide-spread microplastics are on the planet.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#13Plastic found in water contained in a plastic bottle. Not really shocked.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#14This is a 2018 article, just in case it isn't evident for anyone. The fact remains, though, and it is probably worse a year after.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#15It's good to see the honest qualifications in the article: >Mason's team was able to identify specific plastics over 100 microns (0.10 mm) in size but not smaller particles. According to experts contacted by CBC News, there is a chance the Nile Red dye is adhering to another unknown substance other than plastic. >Mason leaves open that possibility but leans strongly to the smaller particles being plastic. >The develo…
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#16I wonder if all the articles talking about the prevalence of microplastics, are in actuality demonstrating the safety of microplastics. If it is in 93% of bottled water, and bottled water is used by millions of people (according to https://www.consumerreports.org/bottled-water/should-we-brea... around 110 Million people in the US avoid drinking tap water), then there has been widespread exposure to microplastics. It…
"Although it is not possible to draw any firm conclusion on toxicity related to the physical hazard of plastic particles, particularly the nano size particles through drinking-water exposure, no reliable information suggests it is a concern. Humans have ingested microplastics and other particles in the environment for decades with no related indication of adverse health effects."
[0] https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326499/9789...
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#17Plastic found in water contained in a plastic bottle. Not really shocked.
I'm even confused by this point--given that some of the water (e.g. San Pellegrino) often comes in glass bottles, can we even assume all bottles measured were plastic? It seems like it should be obvious or else it would be a useless study, but I fail to find a single assertion that all bottled water tested were indeed plastic bottles. That and S. Pellegrino has such a low max count compared with others...
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#18Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#19The actual breakdown by brand: https://dpy68rfhp0glq.cloudfront.net/styles/large/s3/2017_Mi...
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#20Plastic found in water contained in a plastic bottle. Not really shocked.
I used to think the same thing, But I've seen reports recently that these levels are in rain water and tap water as well. The particles are just in the water cycle now it seems. Looking forward to more information.