Former math TA* here. What if the pb isn't the $100 barebone calculator but the way/medium by which math is currently instructed in the U.S.? To this day, we're still teaching math with pen & paper, and require students to memorize concepts like how to differentiate functions of the form 1/x, x^2...etc. To test proficiency, well we give pen & paper tests and forbid most notes, but we still provide you a calculator be…
> differentiate functions of the form 1/x, x^2...etc. To test proficiency, well we give pen & paper tests and forbid most notes, Maybe it's a US thing, but that sounds horrible. When I was a teacher, we usually allowed notes and always gave them the differentiation formulas as well as every other formula they might need. Why are you guys getting them to memorize a bunch of specific facts that they'll forget after the…
Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
181–190 of 460 posts
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but most test proctors make you clear the memory before the test. In fact, one of the programs my friends and I wrote was one that faked the memory clearing process. This worked because at the time the test proctors didn't really know how the calculator worked so our fake was good enough.
Ha, that’s pretty good. Back when I was in school a million years ago, nobody thought to make us clear the memory before exams. So people just got away with it, as far as I know.
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think a better solution is to have the school purchase all of the calculators and give them to students at the time of the exam. This also would align with driving costs down since schools will not want to pay $100 per calculator for their student body.
So then you'd have to use a calculator you've never used before during a high stakes exam? Doesn't sound good to me.
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's true that computers can allow exploratory and multi...dimensional or multi-representations of math concepts in way that can be very very powerful to teach. That said pen and paper is the only thing you need when you think. The current context is mostly absurd because we give useless tools at absurd prices. Make a rpi like pocket calc with a CAS and RPL (hp forever) or even newer ideas like js/glsl canvas.
> That said pen and paper is the only thing you need when you think. Anecdata, I occasionally design with CAD software. Working on details, it's hard for me to draw up(think up) the first draft in CAD. Pen and paper is the only way to get the thing off the ground and running. Basic things require the most basic tools. What i'm trying to say is that you are correct.
But pen & paper shouldn't be the only medium. That's more along of what I meant.
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#185Former math TA* here. What if the pb isn't the $100 barebone calculator but the way/medium by which math is currently instructed in the U.S.? To this day, we're still teaching math with pen & paper, and require students to memorize concepts like how to differentiate functions of the form 1/x, x^2...etc. To test proficiency, well we give pen & paper tests and forbid most notes, but we still provide you a calculator be…
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#186Former math TA* here. What if the pb isn't the $100 barebone calculator but the way/medium by which math is currently instructed in the U.S.? To this day, we're still teaching math with pen & paper, and require students to memorize concepts like how to differentiate functions of the form 1/x, x^2...etc. To test proficiency, well we give pen & paper tests and forbid most notes, but we still provide you a calculator be…
> differentiate functions of the form 1/x, x^2...etc. To test proficiency, well we give pen & paper tests and forbid most notes, Maybe it's a US thing, but that sounds horrible. When I was a teacher, we usually allowed notes and always gave them the differentiation formulas as well as every other formula they might need. Why are you guys getting them to memorize a bunch of specific facts that they'll forget after the…
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#187How is there not a giant 2nd hand marketplace of TI graphing calculators for super cheap? Like after 30 years of basically producing a functionally identical product that few people need after college, there should be cheap used graphing calculators everywhere.
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes most of my engineering classes back in college allowed you to use a cheat-sheet. Cheat sheets are way faster than thumbing through a book or notes in a calculator. And most problems required you to show your work. Maybe you could cross-check your results and fix something. The funny thing is to an extent, the performance of the student seems to be inversely proportional to the density of the cheat-sheet. The wors…
> The funny thing is to an extent, the performance of the student seems to be inversely proportional to the density of the cheat-sheet. This brings back the memory of the circuit theory exam. You could bring a cheatsheet but it was mostly useless. The test had very simple numbers (1, -1, 2, 1/2, -i or things like that) because the professor didn't want to be bothered checking complex formulas and the difficulty was m…
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#189My question is how has the second hand market not killed it already?
Re: Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can easily store notes on a TI calculator. I had a TI-85 in college, and was occasionally guilty of writing TI-BASIC programs to make tests easier (for example, I had one which computed Euler's method).
Most test proctors make you clear your memory before a test in high school. In college they don't care as much because they are used to making "open book tests".
I’ve never seen a professor that knew about archived programs.