11–20 of 251 posts
No it's not. Debt is measured in dollars. GDP is dollars per year.
Debt/GDP is $/($/yr)=yr
This ratio converts debt, a number it's hard to have intuition for, to years. It tells us how many years of productivity we owe. For those of us who don't manage $30 billion in assets years of productivity probably carries more meaning than big numbers with 12 zeros.
The interest rates on US debt are artificially low because their default risk is based on the willingness, not the ability, of the USG to repay them. That's because the ability is a given, since the government can print the currency the debt is denominated in. Corporate bonds are a bad analogy because their risk is mostly in defaulting, whereas if something goes sideways in America, Treasury bonds will fail by causin…
There's a difference. The govt doesn't have this ability to print money and pay debt. The Fed does. Which means that the Fed has been keeping interest rates already artificially low by printing money. It'll take one misstep or one recession for the debt requirements to be so high that the Fed will have to make a choice between keeping rates low, causing massive inflation vs high causing massive drop in gdp and jobs.…
> Because debt-to-GDP is apples-to-nonsense. No it's not. Debt is measured in dollars. GDP is dollars per year. Debt/GDP is $/($/yr)=yr This ratio converts debt, a number it's hard to have intuition for, to years. It tells us how many years of productivity we owe. For those of us who don't manage $30 billion in assets years of productivity probably carries more meaning than big numbers with 12 zeros.
Like the housing bubble, our debt hasn't been a problem and it's not going to be a problem right up until it is a problem. It will be a black swan event and afterward everyone will claim that they saw it coming and "the other guy" ignored it.
Like the housing bubble, our debt hasn't been a problem and it's not going to be a problem right up until it is a problem. It will be a black swan event and afterward everyone will claim that they saw it coming and "the other guy" ignored it.
How much would taxes have to go up (because spending can't go down, right?) for citizens to contribute their fair share of paying down the debt?
> Because debt-to-GDP is apples-to-nonsense. No it's not. Debt is measured in dollars. GDP is dollars per year. Debt/GDP is $/($/yr)=yr This ratio converts debt, a number it's hard to have intuition for, to years. It tells us how many years of productivity we owe. For those of us who don't manage $30 billion in assets years of productivity probably carries more meaning than big numbers with 12 zeros.
You could divide by other numbers - an example the author gives is hard assets- and come up with a different percentage.
> Because debt-to-GDP is apples-to-nonsense. No it's not. Debt is measured in dollars. GDP is dollars per year. Debt/GDP is $/($/yr)=yr This ratio converts debt, a number it's hard to have intuition for, to years. It tells us how many years of productivity we owe. For those of us who don't manage $30 billion in assets years of productivity probably carries more meaning than big numbers with 12 zeros.
> Because debt-to-GDP is apples-to-nonsense. No it's not. Debt is measured in dollars. GDP is dollars per year. Debt/GDP is $/($/yr)=yr This ratio converts debt, a number it's hard to have intuition for, to years. It tells us how many years of productivity we owe. For those of us who don't manage $30 billion in assets years of productivity probably carries more meaning than big numbers with 12 zeros.
so, 103 years of productivity for the US?
Like the housing bubble, our debt hasn't been a problem and it's not going to be a problem right up until it is a problem. It will be a black swan event and afterward everyone will claim that they saw it coming and "the other guy" ignored it.
In the mean time, are us Americans ever going to get a president that focuses on paying down the debt? How much would taxes have to go up (because spending can't go down, right?) for citizens to contribute their fair share of paying down the debt?
> Because debt-to-GDP is apples-to-nonsense. No it's not. Debt is measured in dollars. GDP is dollars per year. Debt/GDP is $/($/yr)=yr This ratio converts debt, a number it's hard to have intuition for, to years. It tells us how many years of productivity we owe. For those of us who don't manage $30 billion in assets years of productivity probably carries more meaning than big numbers with 12 zeros.