The article says: "A paper by Google’s researchers seen by the FT, that was briefly posted earlier this week on a Nasa website before being removed, claimed that their processor was able to perform a calculation in three minutes and 20 seconds that would take today’s most advanced classical computer, known as Summit, approximately 10,000 years." Why was that paper removed on the Nasa website? Also, I'm curious if sup…
Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#12The paper was called "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor" and was available at [1] but is now removed. I also found a partial abstract [2]: "The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of ru…
"Document ID: 20190030475 Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large computational space. Here, we report using a processor with programmable superconducting qubits to create quantum states on 53 qubits, occupying a state space 2(exp53) ~ 10(exp16). Measurements from repeated experiments sample the corresponding probability distribution, which we verify using classical simulations. While our processor takes about 200 seconds to sample one instance of the quantum circuit 1 million times, a state-of-the-art supercomputer would require approximately 10,000 years to perform the equivalent task. This dramatic speedup relative to all known classical algorithms provides an experimental realization of quantum supremacy on a computational task and heralds the advent of a much-anticipated computing paradigm. 20190801 August 2019 Copyright, Public use permitted Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20190030475 CASI application/pdf Mandra, Salvatore Rieffel, Eleanor G. Biswas, Rupak ARC-E-DAA-TN71198 NASA/TP-2019-220319 Computer Systems"
Happily provided by Google. ;)
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Ig1-Fl...
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#13The paper was called "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor" and was available at [1] but is now removed. I also found a partial abstract [2]: "The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of ru…
A little more for you: "Document ID: 20190030475 Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large comput…
https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00444
"Establishing the Quantum Supremacy Frontier with a 281 Pflop/s Simulation"
Benjamin Villalonga, Dmitry Lyakh, Sergio Boixo, Hartmut Neven, Travis S. Humble, Rupak Biswas, Eleanor G. Rieffel, Alan Ho, Salvatore Mandrà
(Submitted on 1 May 2019)
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#14The paper was called "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor" and was available at [1] but is now removed. I also found a partial abstract [2]: "The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of ru…
A little more for you: "Document ID: 20190030475 Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large comput…
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#15The paper was called "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor" and was available at [1] but is now removed. I also found a partial abstract [2]: "The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of ru…
A little more for you: "Document ID: 20190030475 Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large comput…
Bing cached the pdf! :) http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=%2220190030475%22&d=5027660...
Mirror https://filebin.net/k5rr4l0p6ldde7hr/Quantum_Supremacy_Using...
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#16The article says: "A paper by Google’s researchers seen by the FT, that was briefly posted earlier this week on a Nasa website before being removed, claimed that their processor was able to perform a calculation in three minutes and 20 seconds that would take today’s most advanced classical computer, known as Summit, approximately 10,000 years." Why was that paper removed on the Nasa website? Also, I'm curious if sup…
Yes, What computation are we talking about?
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#17Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
A little more for you: "Document ID: 20190030475 Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of running quantum algorithms in an exponentially large comput…
Even Better: Bing cached the pdf! :) http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=%2220190030475%22&d=5027660... Mirror https://filebin.net/k5rr4l0p6ldde7hr/Quantum_Supremacy_Using...
Emphasis 2006 :-)
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#19This website had a paywall... Why do Google claim to have reached quantum supremacy, can't they prove it?
Re: Google claims to have reached quantum supremacy
#20The paper was called "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor" and was available at [1] but is now removed. I also found a partial abstract [2]: "The tantalizing promise of quantum computers is that certain computational tasks might be executed exponentially faster on a quantum processor than on a classical processor. A fundamental challenge is to build a high-fidelity processor capable of ru…