Isn’t that a bit of a sexist logo...?
Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
11–20 of 229 posts
Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#12potential successor to Alpine for lightweight docker images?
Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it, though? (That's a bit of a meme, sorry.) No, seriously. Why would I choose this over Alpine? Or, given the failure modes of Alpine as a container image, why would I even choose Alpine? Everything in this space is absolute shite.
What’s the problem with alpine?
Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#14Isn’t that a bit of a sexist logo...?
Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it, though? (That's a bit of a meme, sorry.) No, seriously. Why would I choose this over Alpine? Or, given the failure modes of Alpine as a container image, why would I even choose Alpine? Everything in this space is absolute shite.
What’s the problem with alpine?
ITT counseled in favor of using containers based on ubuntu or centos.
I haven't done huge amounts of container work, but my light outings with Alpine have been fine. Maybe load and internationalization expose more personality in musl, or these concerns pertain to issues that have been fixed.
It's something to keep in mind when assessing risk.
[1] https://www.pythonpodcast.com/docker-python-production-episo...
Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#16Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#17That logo makes it a non-starter in any organization I've seen in the last decade.
Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#18Isn’t that a bit of a sexist logo...?
Re: Kiss – A Linux distribution with a focus on “less is more”
#19I used to like Xubuntu, but this was like a decade ago at this point.