Live data from Hacker News

iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

austinmann.com

101–110 of 294 posts

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#101
post #54

I have the Nikon full frame D850 along with the holy trilogy of lenses (14-24mm + 24-70mm + 70-200mm f2.8 zoom lenses). in 2018, for every picture I took with the D800/850, I took +200 iphone pictures. I still believe there is room for a high caliber camera but I don't want to own it anymore, I just want to rent whenever I need it.

I want a high caliber camera but I never want to have to carry it around with me...

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#102

How could anyone read this without knowing it's an advertisement: "today I’m just as thrilled to be putting an entirely new Ultra Wide lens in my pocket. It gives us another format to tell the story, another perspective to visualize, and a better rounded tool for doing our best creative work."

You sound mad. Are you mad at Apple? Mad at some random pro photographer who obviously likes Apple?

It reads like a photographer who is a fan of Apple's camera tech. Shows some very nice photos (bc he's a pro or something I gather). Not an "advertisement". I can't see where any money changed hands from Apple to this photographer to write what he did. And I'm sure everyone who is a fan of shooting on Android phones will wait for the comparison reviews.

So why you so mad bro?

You read like an Apple hater.

Edit: Some ppl are mad that I used the word "mad" to describe the original comment. The assertion that this article is some paid advertisement is unfounded by lack of any evidence that Apple paid this photographer any money. At most Apple gave this person a loner iPhone for review - Apple does that.

Now would Apple "bet" that this person would write a glowing review? Quite possibly. Companies/people leveraging their fanbase is nothing new. But to say it's an "ad" is unfounded.

You should be glad you can spot bias in a review.

The question remains... why are you so mad?

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#103

How could anyone read this without knowing it's an advertisement: "today I’m just as thrilled to be putting an entirely new Ultra Wide lens in my pocket. It gives us another format to tell the story, another perspective to visualize, and a better rounded tool for doing our best creative work."

Austin Mann has reviewed every new iPhone for awhile in this manner. Reviewing equipment while taking travel photos is what he does.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#104

I recently started appreciating 60fps screen but, iPhone 11 came up with 240 fps Galaxy Note10+ came up with 960fps and now Huawei Mate 30 Pro with 7680 fps

Those are video framerates, usable for slowing down things like jumps to water / with skis etc. No screen for general public has 7k+ framerate, would be completely useless waste of energy (and money for expensive research)

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#105
post #50
post #2

These night mode shots are seriously impressive. This might give DSLR manufacturers something to catch up with.

From a technical point of view I'm quite sure my >10 years old Rebel XSi will yield similar photos after editing the raw-file. If you are impressed by this you're probably not really following the tech, don't have any clue about image processing and are just blindly following what Apples advertising is selling you. Most of the "cool" iphone-pictures in non-optimal lighting are about 50% post-processing and they show…

Rebel XSi will yield similar photos after editing the raw-file

Well obviously. The whole point here and the impressive part of the technology is that you get these results by simply pointing and shooting in full auto mode, no manual post processing and with tiny optics and sensors.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#106
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Conservative management. What happens to those who don’t swim?

I'm into taking photos to craft an image of reality. Myself. I couldn't care less for any AI crafting it's image of typical reality for me. I think that's quite set for anyone taking pictures for fun vs. admoney/instafame/...

There's still such thing as physically correct image reconstruction, i.e. removing technical limitations via computational means. Super-resolution, focus stacking, HDR (proper one, without fake colors), highlight color preservation (try to photograph light source while preserving color while not underexposing everything around).

Basically, make images that are currently possible on $3000+ hardware, on $600 hardware.

There's also such thing as perceptually correct image rendering, but that's a whole another can of worms (image appearance models and the like), it isn't scientifically ready just yet.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#107
post #96

How could anyone read this without knowing it's an advertisement: "today I’m just as thrilled to be putting an entirely new Ultra Wide lens in my pocket. It gives us another format to tell the story, another perspective to visualize, and a better rounded tool for doing our best creative work."

Does the author have a bias? Certainly. Is this an advertisement? Ads are paid announcements. There was nothing noting it was paid for in any capacity. There's a difference between an ad and a bias. I find it useful to notice biases because we all have them. Ads are quite different.

First, there can be a big power discrepancy in cases where free product is provided for review purposes. It's different if you are part of a traditional media outfit and have a significant, steady readership. But for someone like this, there can be a lot of pressure to give very favorable write-ups.

Second, this wouldn't be the first time someone did a paid promotion without noting it was paid. I don't know anything about this guy, so I'm not accusing him of anything. I'm just saying it's naive to think that everyone is always highly committed to playing nice with the FTC rules. (See game streamers and their odd tendency to open tons of 'loot boxes' on stream & get significantly better results than expected.)

Finally a lot of the copy reads like it's straight from a press release, with capitalized words and everything.

Whether it's enough to constitute an ad in a regulatory sense, I don't know. But you can be advertised to without the source being a literal ad according to a legal definition.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#108
post #75

The pictures do look good, the colors are nice and the small image on the page is nice. But I haven't seen any 100% crops or full images. it's there that you'll see that the image is worse than a DSLR or another camera with a big lens and sensor. I can get nice pictures (= vibrant and nice colors) with any camera, what I can't get is a sharp image, with sharp edges. I went to a trip with my Android Phone and DSLR, an…

Most people don't zoom in on their photos. They look at them on their phones, full screen on their computers, or at best on a TV (1080p or maybe 4K, but sitting far away). This is what manufacturers optimize for. Getting great pictures for the 95%. Who cares if the hairs on the dog are blurry when you zoom in so much you can't see the rest of the picture? Well, Pros who might want to crop the photo later. And for the…

That's what I thought, and indeed, the full res is useful when you want to post crop and to print them out.

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#109
post #3

Beautiful photos, but why is the Exif scrubbed? I would have liked to see details.

By the way, what happens to exif when you upload online (or also fb or instagram)? Does it get removed or can everyone see my location?

Imgur removes exif: https://help.imgur.com/hc/en-us/articles/201746817-Post-Priv...

Re: iPhone 11 Pro Camera Review

#110
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think if you learn the rule of 2 thirds then it helps a lot. The few people I’ve taught that rule to are much happier with their photos.

Agreed. I took a photography class in college, and I've turned the guidelines on for previews. I still don't have the command of light and expertise with framing demonstrated here, and I'm not carrying a tripod with me anywhere.

I've been taking pictures with my iPhone for years and I never knew about the guidelines as an option. (Or I did, and I turned them off many phones ago without realizing their benefit, forgot, and the settings have been dragged with me since.) Thank you.
Post reply on HN