Live data from Hacker News

Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

tom.preston-werner.com

11–20 of 42 posts

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What, serif fonts?

I don't believe the sites themselves make any stipulations about preferences regarding fonts. It's up to your browser. In any case: Regarding the downvoting: Bring it, bitches. ...just trying to set something straight about established cultural norms around the word "hacker".

[deleted]

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't believe the sites themselves make any stipulations about preferences regarding fonts. It's up to your browser. In any case: Regarding the downvoting: Bring it, bitches. ...just trying to set something straight about established cultural norms around the word "hacker".

I’m still not seeing what you’ve “set straight”.

Jekyll is about taking a few bytes of text and turning them into the multi-megabyte-monstrosity that a website is nowadays expected to be. A real hacker responds to that trend Nancy Reagan style. "Just say no".

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#13
The nice thing about Jekyll is that you can just find a nice looking theme and then fork it, edit the config.yml file with your specifics, such as name/address/etc and then publish.

Posts go under the posts folder, uploaded as md files. It's very nice and clean. You can host a site on github pages and point your .com to their DNS servers.

It frees you up to focus on writing, and you have the benefit of markdown there if you need it.

Makes you wonder why a simple blog site needs to be interacting with a DB and making mad calls all over the place, with loads of insecure plugins and all the rest of it. Just give me simplicity :)

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#14
Recently set up a static gen blog. I went with Hugo over Jekyll. I think its a bit personal preference tbh, but I really liked Hugo's layout, speed, and kinda prefer hacking with Go over Ruby if it comes to that.

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m still not seeing what you’ve “set straight”.

Jekyll is about taking a few bytes of text and turning them into the multi-megabyte-monstrosity that a website is nowadays expected to be. A real hacker responds to that trend Nancy Reagan style. "Just say no".

Jekyll is design-agnostic.

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m still not seeing what you’ve “set straight”.

Jekyll is about taking a few bytes of text and turning them into the multi-megabyte-monstrosity that a website is nowadays expected to be. A real hacker responds to that trend Nancy Reagan style. "Just say no".

Looking at the source of TFA, it seems it downloads a 5.3kb html file, two css files adding up to 2.9kb, and 11.9kb of javascript. (Including GA, alas)

Not as slim as possible, but pretty darn small. My personal blog, using an even older command-line html templating engine (nanoblogger) weighs in at 3kb html, 1.8kb css, and a princely 13.7kb of js. (All from the code formatter I use)

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#17

You call that blogging like a hacker? This is blogging like a hacker: https://www.stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html This is blogging like a hacker: https://blog.fefe.de/

Interestingly, according to your links it looks like hackers invented microblogging.

Most of those blog posts aren’t longer than a paragraph.

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m still not seeing what you’ve “set straight”.

Jekyll is about taking a few bytes of text and turning them into the multi-megabyte-monstrosity that a website is nowadays expected to be. A real hacker responds to that trend Nancy Reagan style. "Just say no".

The post you're commenting on was generated by Jekyll. The data transferred on a cold load is 70.76 KB. Most of that is a TypeKit font.

It's still five times times less data transferred than the Stallman microblog you linked.

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#19

Fascinating. For those who click to read the comments before the actual article, this is Mr. Preston-Werner's introduction of Jekyll, the Ruby static site generator, to the world. He lays out his reasons for creating the tech: >>>First, all my writing would be stored in a Git repository. This would ensure that I could try out different ideas and explore a variety of posts all from the comfort of my preferred editor a…

I have been playing with both over the past two days and am using Pelican because I couldn't get a functioning enough ruby install put together for Jekyll. Either tool looks about equivalent in actual usage... Which is an incredible improvement on the state of the world 12 years ago when i last cared at all about generating web content.

Re: Blogging Like a Hacker (2008)

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m still not seeing what you’ve “set straight”.

Jekyll is about taking a few bytes of text and turning them into the multi-megabyte-monstrosity that a website is nowadays expected to be. A real hacker responds to that trend Nancy Reagan style. "Just say no".

No, that only happens if you choose to make it a multi-megabyte monstrosity. My website, which uses Jekyll, has a home page that is under 10 KB uncompressed. It's just a HTML page and two CSS files: https://saagarjha.com
Post reply on HN