Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
1–10 of 368 posts
Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#2Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#3Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#4>> part of a shadow program in which employees spend two weeks sitting in on their CEO’s meetings, feedback sessions and media or analyst calls
Does anyone know of companies that do this "internship" / shadowing / mentoring built into the company?
Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#5I don't see how it's worth that much unless their plan is to strip all features from gitlab community or expect a Google acquisition.
Microsoft and Google seem on pretty good terms lately, but right now, a lot of Google's public projects are posted on a Microsoft code hosting platform. I could see a day where Google says they need their own, buys GitLab, and moves over everything.
Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#6Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#7Question to current Gitlab users: Why do you use Gitlab instead of Github? What are the killer features that make it worth switching to?
Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#8I am curious how the Gitlab is so valuable. I've never used the service, but HN posts keep me informed superficially. Could someone explain the valuation?
Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#9https://info.seibert-media.net/display/Atlassian/Atlassian+P...
Re: Gitlab More Than Doubles Valuation to $2.75B Ahead of Planned 2020 IPO
#10A cool part from the article >> part of a shadow program in which employees spend two weeks sitting in on their CEO’s meetings, feedback sessions and media or analyst calls Does anyone know of companies that do this "internship" / shadowing / mentoring built into the company?
I'm a firm believe that companies should be run like that but many other founders like to play their cards much closer to their chests.