41–50 of 237 posts
I read the Twitter post but did not understand what is happening. Can someone please explain.
Apple employees are using their product, downloading lots of data, not paying for any of it, and the OP doesn't like it or can afford it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're basically bragging they have something Apple really wants. Now they have a bunch of people at least interested in what they got. I'll say that's not a bad PR.
Also a great way to throw out massive red flags to any enterprise user that cares about privacy and non-disclosure. IP address data is pretty sensitive information, and throwing it out there like this, even in aggregate, is not OK because of what it shows. No matter how much PR this gets, this goes both ways.
A brief reminder: Whenever you publish code or documentation that might be used/scraped by the outside world, ALWAYS use a domain you own. If you're on Cloudflare you can instantly (and for free) create Page Rules to use Cloudflare as a CDN, redirect to another CDN, or black-hole or reroute traffic anywhere you want.
A brief reminder: Whenever you publish code or documentation that might be used/scraped by the outside world, ALWAYS use a domain you own. If you're on Cloudflare you can instantly (and for free) create Page Rules to use Cloudflare as a CDN, redirect to another CDN, or black-hole or reroute traffic anywhere you want.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're basically bragging they have something Apple really wants. Now they have a bunch of people at least interested in what they got. I'll say that's not a bad PR.
Also a great way to throw out massive red flags to any enterprise user that cares about privacy and non-disclosure. IP address data is pretty sensitive information, and throwing it out there like this, even in aggregate, is not OK because of what it shows. No matter how much PR this gets, this goes both ways.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also a great way to throw out massive red flags to any enterprise user that cares about privacy and non-disclosure. IP address data is pretty sensitive information, and throwing it out there like this, even in aggregate, is not OK because of what it shows. No matter how much PR this gets, this goes both ways.
This isn't sensitive information. Anyone with a BGP session can have this information. [1] [1] = https://bgp.he.net/AS714#_prefixes
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're basically bragging they have something Apple really wants. Now they have a bunch of people at least interested in what they got. I'll say that's not a bad PR.
Also a great way to throw out massive red flags to any enterprise user that cares about privacy and non-disclosure. IP address data is pretty sensitive information, and throwing it out there like this, even in aggregate, is not OK because of what it shows. No matter how much PR this gets, this goes both ways.
If you want to have a business relationship with someone, pay them.
Or perhaps you have reached out to them, but are for some reason still complaining on Twitter to drum up PR or something?
Regardless, this posting is ridiculously context-free to the point of being click-baity. (But hey, good job, I clicked on it anyway.)