21–30 of 86 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Safari seems to be consistently behind these days, not sure why.
Apple seems to be the only browser developer that makes user-centric changes first, not developer-centric. I'm OK with that.
I don't think BigInt is some adtech anti-feature.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple seems to be the only browser developer that makes user-centric changes first, not developer-centric. I'm OK with that.
Given their $$$ seems like they could do both. I don't think BigInt is some adtech anti-feature.
EDIT: I understand now, the numerator on the first term is ascending odds and the denominator is ascending evens. Thanks for everyone's help!
Can someone explain the logic behind the evolution of the fractions at each stage? I see that (1/4) becomes (1/4^2) and (1/4^3), but it's not obvious to me how (1/3)->(1/5)->(1/7) flows (odds? primes?), or (1/2) -> (13/24) -> (135/246). EDIT: I understand now, the numerator on the first term is ascending odds and the denominator is ascending evens. Thanks for everyone's help!
equivalently you just list odds on the numerator and evens in the denominator
Can someone explain the logic behind the evolution of the fractions at each stage? I see that (1/4) becomes (1/4^2) and (1/4^3), but it's not obvious to me how (1/3)->(1/5)->(1/7) flows (odds? primes?), or (1/2) -> (13/24) -> (135/246). EDIT: I understand now, the numerator on the first term is ascending odds and the denominator is ascending evens. Thanks for everyone's help!
You are left with this (in the 4th line):
1 3 5 1
- - - -
2 4 6 7
The pattern I see is that, starting from the top left and reading numerator, denominator, numerator, denominator and so on gives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 if you ignore the last numerator.
I may have it wrong, but that looks like the pattern.
Can someone explain the logic behind the evolution of the fractions at each stage? I see that (1/4) becomes (1/4^2) and (1/4^3), but it's not obvious to me how (1/3)->(1/5)->(1/7) flows (odds? primes?), or (1/2) -> (13/24) -> (135/246). EDIT: I understand now, the numerator on the first term is ascending odds and the denominator is ascending evens. Thanks for everyone's help!
Remove the leading 3 and the trailing term of 1/4 increasing in power. You are left with this (in the 4th line): 1 3 5 1 - - - - 2 4 6 7 The pattern I see is that, starting from the top left and reading numerator, denominator, numerator, denominator and so on gives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 if you ignore the last numerator. I may have it wrong, but that looks like the pattern.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remove the leading 3 and the trailing term of 1/4 increasing in power. You are left with this (in the 4th line): 1 3 5 1 - - - - 2 4 6 7 The pattern I see is that, starting from the top left and reading numerator, denominator, numerator, denominator and so on gives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 if you ignore the last numerator. I may have it wrong, but that looks like the pattern.
4th step is 1357/2468
Earlier quoted context omitted.
4th step is 1357/2468
Is that simplified? I'm just going off of this image: http://ajennings.net/blog/images/formula.png
i think we're saying the same thing i misunderstood your comment. 1357/2468 is the first fraction of the NEXT line that isnt in the image
