Earlier quoted context omitted.
Higher production value.
Woah i wasnt trying to be racist the Fremen in the books literally go on a genocidal jihad later. In the first book they hint at just how far their fanaticism goes and explicitly includes a part where they hijack a vehicle and crash it into Harkonnen troops. The political undertones would be interesting to see play out in this modern climate.
Arabic and Islamic Themes in Frank Herbert's “Dune” (2004-2017)
71–74 of 74 posts
Re: Arabic and Islamic Themes in Frank Herbert's “Dune” (2004-2017)
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't speak for what bugged the above poster, but that sentence is worded in an incredibly awkward way.
Not really. English your first language? I’d take out the last comma and that’s it
Re: Arabic and Islamic Themes in Frank Herbert's “Dune” (2004-2017)
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the later books, perhaps the ones by Brian Herbert, they discover a planet of Jews, mostly unchanged for 15,000 years, except they have created some self-fashioned bene gesseret-like women.
last Frank Herbert book Chapter House Dune and from what I remember it was more like an underground society of Jewsish people who kept their beliefs completely unchanged over the thousands of years, as opposed to all the other religions and societies. I think it was politically organised along matriarchal lines but there were still male rabbis. I shoul read it again it's been decades! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
Re: Arabic and Islamic Themes in Frank Herbert's “Dune” (2004-2017)
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you elaborate?
Dune has often been interpreted as a story that contains metaphors to nodern politics such as how the spice dependence is similar to our oil dependence and undertones of how authoritarian regimes try to control the fates of peoples. A lot of the events in the books can be drawn as parallels to our history and modern day situations.
> Very first paragraph, and already a turn-off.
I know the context for the book’s first phrase, I wanted to know why earlier commenter considered the book’s first phrase a turn-off.