This made me realize I have heard ZERO news on Assange after his arrest, and the likelihood of him being tortured and rendered and railroaded of course means our nation (US) of laws and rights is a sham. Don't tell me it's boring, this should be a sideshow for the media like OJ. Rape trial? Russian meddling? Little guy vs the government? International intrigue? Crickets. A truly independent media would be tracking hi…
He is sitting his 50 week sentence in HM Prison Belmarsh in UK and has access to lawyers. Media is tracking his case. There is nothing to report. There are people who spew up conspiracy theories on the spot when they have not heard anything, from pure ignorance, yet they speak ill of mainstream media.
Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
181–190 of 459 posts
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#182I think the administration badly, badly mishandled Snowden and Assange, and allowed Russia to coopt them by isolating and threatening them. If they had treated them as whistleblowers and journalists (even if they had nefarious motivations), they could have kept them in "the west" instead of driving them into the arms of Russia. I don't believe that Assange was a Russian agent at the beginning but he was surely one by…
If he was an agent the Muller investigation would have revealed it. It doesn't say so in the paper that is public, I actually read the whole thing.
You're an agent if you get orders from Kremlin, people's interests align often with different people, hence the world and politics is complicated.
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed and cheap enough to throw away after each project for improved opsec.
Given that you can change the MAC address, how does throwing it away improve opsec...?
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
To the contrary, I think the fact that you think both Snowden and Assange are Russian agents demonstrates that the administrations response was actually quite effective.
I was going to say exactly this. It's amazing how many Americans honestly think it's clear that Snowden is a "bad guy" because he's close to the Russians. Likewise Assange was pushed into a position that made him very unlikable to the US center-left (he could have probably played his hand a bit better). So mainstream American's are distrustful of both and pretty much everyone hates Assange.
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
To the contrary, I think the fact that you think both Snowden and Assange are Russian agents demonstrates that the administrations response was actually quite effective.
I was going to say exactly this. It's amazing how many Americans honestly think it's clear that Snowden is a "bad guy" because he's close to the Russians. Likewise Assange was pushed into a position that made him very unlikable to the US center-left (he could have probably played his hand a bit better). So mainstream American's are distrustful of both and pretty much everyone hates Assange.
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#186Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#187I think the administration badly, badly mishandled Snowden and Assange, and allowed Russia to coopt them by isolating and threatening them. If they had treated them as whistleblowers and journalists (even if they had nefarious motivations), they could have kept them in "the west" instead of driving them into the arms of Russia. I don't believe that Assange was a Russian agent at the beginning but he was surely one by…
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
To the contrary, I think the fact that you think both Snowden and Assange are Russian agents demonstrates that the administrations response was actually quite effective.
I was going to say exactly this. It's amazing how many Americans honestly think it's clear that Snowden is a "bad guy" because he's close to the Russians. Likewise Assange was pushed into a position that made him very unlikable to the US center-left (he could have probably played his hand a bit better). So mainstream American's are distrustful of both and pretty much everyone hates Assange.
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#189US expatriates are the only expats in the world that have to file annual taxes (and report foreign bank accounts). It's ridiculous for most of us (99% are not tax exiles or tax evaders, we just left the USA for our own reasons). I wonder if Snowden files taxes?
Don't even get me started.... In many countries it's hard or near impossible for US citizens to get bank accounts and other financial services, I guess due to them not wanting to deal with reporting requirements? Europeans, Aussies, and pretty much everyone have it way easier. Makes me so mad.
AIUI, it's not just reporting requirements but the potential for massive fines that's driving this.
Re: Edward Snowden: Permanent Record
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
It costs over a grand to quit the club known as "citizenship" you're going to want citizenship in wherever you reside first when you give up US citizenship (you could choose to be stateless, but that makes more problems than it solves). Doing this does not absolve you of existing debts in the eyes of the IRS. And finally, you'll be interviewed at the consulate and if your stated reason for giving up citizenship is "t…
Apparently, you can run for any government office in a foreign state and it immediately nullifies your US citizenship. I have only heard this as rumour, and I don't have time to confirm / deny this, but it may be worth looking into.
For some cases it sounds like only if you have the intention of giving up your citizenship, then you have to get a "Certificate of Loss of Nationality". But I'm not a expert in this area, but I can see where this idea is coming from.
Such employment, however, will result in one's
expatriation only if done voluntarily with the intention
of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. Running for foreign
office, even foreign head of state, is not a potentially
expatriating act; only accepting, serving in, or
performing the duties of a foreign office are potentially
expatriating as described above.
The Department has adopted an administrative presumption
that U.S. nationals intend to retain their U.S.
citizenship when they naturalize as nationals of a
foreign state, declare their allegiance to a foreign
state, or accept non-policy level employment with a
foreign government.
Also: The presumption that a person intends to retain U.S. nationality is not applicable when the individual:
1. formally renounces U.S. nationality before a consular officer;
2. serves as an officer in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities with the United States; or
3. takes a policy level position in a foreign state
Cases in categories 2 and 3 will be developed carefully by a U.S. consular officer to ascertain the individual's intent toward U.S. nationality.
Kinda confusing, but sounds like if you were elected prime minister of Canada (which would be policy level), then there's the presumption you wanted to give up citizenship, while working as a employee for the Canadian government such as driving the snow plows would be ok but things are reviewed by case by case.