Uber lays off 435 people
techcrunch.com
Uber lays off 435 people
1–10 of 611 posts
Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#2[1]: https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-uber-hiring-o...
Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#3Wow
Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#4Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#5Related, but Uber is said to be hiring 2,00 for it's new Chicago office next year [1]. A mix of engineering and operations. My understanding this would be under their freight team, which according to this Techcrunch article, was unaffected by this layoff. [1]: https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-uber-hiring-o...
Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#6Related, but Uber is said to be hiring 2,00 for it's new Chicago office next year [1]. A mix of engineering and operations. My understanding this would be under their freight team, which according to this Techcrunch article, was unaffected by this layoff. [1]: https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-uber-hiring-o...
Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#7Related, but Uber is said to be hiring 2,00 for it's new Chicago office next year [1]. A mix of engineering and operations. My understanding this would be under their freight team, which according to this Techcrunch article, was unaffected by this layoff. [1]: https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-uber-hiring-o...
1: https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Dallas-Leaders-Approve-Abo...
Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#8EDIT: Did I say I believe there's a recession coming? No. I said (accurately) that there are growing FEARS of one. There's definitely tightening of investments and capital happening.
Re: Uber lays off 435 people
#9Related, but Uber is said to be hiring 2,00 for it's new Chicago office next year [1]. A mix of engineering and operations. My understanding this would be under their freight team, which according to this Techcrunch article, was unaffected by this layoff. [1]: https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-uber-hiring-o...
Unless there was a performance issue then why not allow these employees to transfer if they want to?