Live data from Hacker News

The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs

theatlantic.com

11–20 of 152 posts

Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs

#12
This is a great point. An important aspect of this is that most of the Amazon's deforestation is land owners developing their land and adding to the agricultural sectors of South America.

If we want to stop them, we need to stop the excessive consumption of these goods. This doesn't just mean stopping over eating, it means changing what you eat and paying more for goods sourced locally.

Unfortunately, that means from countries with higher labor costs and higher taxes because of higher subsidies.

It's a hard sell for most consumers. How do we accomplish that?

Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs

#13
Related: the fires in the Congo, Africa, this week resulted in bad air-quality in the northeast of Brazil. That made the national news.

Sadly it's not only the Amazon that is cutting down on trees. Besides the fires in Africa, Canada was also in the news some time ago. Apparently that prompted the Canadian government to put up a page to deal with the issue: https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/our-natural-resources/forests-forest...

Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs

#16
post #6

Not least because lungs take in oxygen and output carbon dioxide. I guess while the Amazon is on fire it acts a bit like lungs.

Well from the point of view of your body, your lungs bring oxygen in and take carbon dioxide out.

Ha, nice one! So if the Amazon is like lungs in this sense, where is it bringing the oxygen in from?

Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs

#17

One Strange Rock, a nature documentary hosted by Will Smith (stay with me) actually goes into this in some detail and I would definitely recommend a watch. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7651892/

I saw it, a bit skeptic about Will Smith but the production is high Quality, I suppose with Will the show is pointing younger generations.

Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs

#20
It might be that burning down every living tree would not make a dent in the oxygen supply, but having the earth temperature go up 5 degrees would kill most phytoplankton, and that would end the oxygen supply (eventually).

This type of articles is the last thing we need right now, it all piles up on the narrative that the consequences of climate change are really not that bad and there is no real urgency in doing anything about it.

Especially if that implies a change of behaviors like eating less meat. Nobody wants to give away their cheeseburgers as Elizabeth Warren factitiously says, this how you make headlines and get elected for office, tell people what they want to hear, stay away from the truth.

Post reply on HN