The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
theatlantic.com
The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
1–10 of 152 posts
Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#2Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#3Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#4Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#5The above link is a paragraph and a click-through link. This is the actual article: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/08/amazon-f...
Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#6Not least because lungs take in oxygen and output carbon dioxide. I guess while the Amazon is on fire it acts a bit like lungs.
Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#7Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#8Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#9Please refrain promoting deforestation
Re: The Amazon Is Not the Earth’s Lungs
#10Please refrain promoting deforestation
> Losing the Amazon, beyond representing a planetary historic tragedy beyond measure, would also make meeting the ambitious climate goals of the Paris Agreement all but impossible.
It discusses a misconception that has been propogated lately.
> The Amazon is a vast, ineffable, vital, living wonder. It does not, however, supply the planet with 20 percent of its oxygen.
> As the biochemist Nick Lane wrote in his 2003 book Oxygen, “Even the most foolhardy destruction of world forests could hardly dint our oxygen supply, though in other respects such short-sighted idiocy is an unspeakable tragedy.”