Live data from Hacker News

Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

nytimes.com

91–100 of 224 posts

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#91

I'm surprised investors aren't more scared of the competition, particularly Microsoft and its Teams product that is part of Office 365. Maybe it's not a huge deal because the overlap of Slack customers and Office 365 customers isn't that big?

No chance to survive

The explanation is here

For Slack has no moat

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sales and marketing.

If they need to spend more on sales an marketing than it brings in they are even more doomed than I thought...

If you can spend 1 million in year 1 to acquire a customer who pays back 3 million over the next five years, that’s a good investment, but you’ll initially book a loss.

Enterprise sales is expensive, but the contracts are very large and long-term.

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use Skype daily and have never had a problem with it, I've never understood the hate if i'm honest.

The Skype of today is crap compared to the first Skype I used and loved. It is completely unclear what it tries to be now and the interface is horrible. I have an unlimited-Europe plan with it and a phone number attached to it, but I'd rather use something else some day. I haven't found any cheaper alternatives though. Maybe someone here can point one out to me.

I agree that Skype is an awful UI these days, think that Microsoft ruined it, and don’t know a better one to suggest.

But as an aside, “the cheapest one you can find is horrible” is probably appropriate for what “cheapest” usually translates to in products, and expecting to find one cheaper and better when you can’t find one cheaper at all, seems optimistic.

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#94
post #8

>> Revenue rose to $145 million from $92 million a year earlier. Slack said it had more than 100,000 paying customers, a 37 percent increase over last year. They should be fine. $307m of the loss was stock-related compensation. How could you screw up a business who has a product as popular as Slack?

They paid out double their revenue in stock? That doesn’t sound fine. It sounds like their costs are over 3 times their revenue.

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#95
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Slack is different from those companies of yore. Back then, if you created a chat program and went to an investment bank, they'd laugh you out of the office, or advise that you take whatever acquisition offer you can get, because a chat program with tons of competitors isn't enough to build a profitable business on.

Skype got investment from VCs in 2003, 16 years ago. is that "yore" enough for you? https://www.vcgate.com/Bessemer_Venture_Partners.asp

Skype wasn't a chat program.

Skype was a P2P phone calling program over TCP/IP.

I.e., a neat trick that might have killed traditional telecoms.

Then Microsoft bought Skype and killed it instead.

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#96

Stewart Butterfield, Slack’s chief executive, said in an interview that it would take time for the market to understand his company since it had created a new category of software, unlike soda or cars We've had public business software companies for decades, they all created a new "category" of software, why does he think his is something new? Fundamentally speaking, how is Slack any different to the first email prog…

It’s the usual marketing wank

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use Skype daily and have never had a problem with it, I've never understood the hate if i'm honest.

The Skype of today is crap compared to the first Skype I used and loved. It is completely unclear what it tries to be now and the interface is horrible. I have an unlimited-Europe plan with it and a phone number attached to it, but I'd rather use something else some day. I haven't found any cheaper alternatives though. Maybe someone here can point one out to me.

> It is completely unclear what it tries to be now and the interface is horrible.

Instant messenger, internet phone and video/presentation conferencing.

Am i missing something here because its literally my primary business communication tool.

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#98
post #31

Slack is overrated and over priced. Its not like messenger platforms are difficult. We have had msn messneger, yahoo messenger, whatsapp, rocketchat, facebook messneger, messenger, gchat, skype. Slack doesn't do anything particularly special.

As someone that uses both slack and webex teams at work, I cannot emphasize enough how much better slack is. Maybe it's because webex teams is beyond awful, but I've used skype and hipchat before as well, so I feel like I can make a somewhat fair assessment.

Genuine question - I use WebEx Teams at work too and it works perfectly fine for the most part. It's also very lightweight compared to Slack. What do you find so terrible about it?

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sales and marketing.

If they need to spend more on sales an marketing than it brings in they are even more doomed than I thought...

Sales and marketing are largely one-time expenses, but customers can have very high LTVs. So you can zoom into a particular quarter of a company's results and they can have huge losses. But, in the future they can dial down their sales and marketing expense, and be sitting on an extremely profitable business.

Re: Slack’s Shares Plunge After It Predicts a Larger Loss

#100

Leaving aside the costs of their listing and related compensation (which are crazy high!) they made a $57m loss on $145m in revenue. Considering that they are a pure software company this is quite shocking and, to me, a sign not to touch them with a barge pole.

Where did you get that $57 million number?

For its second fiscal quarter, Slack posted a loss of $364 million

Post reply on HN