Live data from Hacker News

In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

wired.co.uk

121–130 of 437 posts

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#121

Not sure how profitable it would be, but if Mozilla created a privacy-focused email client, I would consider leaving the Google ecosystem.

Like Mozilla Thunderbird? Like most email clients it blocks loading external resources by default. Or am I missing something?

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#122

Those who want a world where Firefox has a higher market share and mind share, please consider doing the following: 1. Evangelize Firefox to people you know any chance you get and show them all the reasons why its better than Chrome (focus on privacy as an important point). Show them how great browsing can be with a few key extensions (like uBlock Origin, Containers, Privacy Possum, etc.). This does not imply that Mo…

Is there some way to ensure the donation money will actually go to Firefox and not to some sort of "diversity" campaign?

What’s bothering you, really? So you have evidence Mozilla is splurging their money into political campaigns ?

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yikes why would you not want companies investing in diversity? Especially if they are the interface to our online world?

Because diversity in the tech world isn't real. Just read about Brendan Eich. He got fired because he had the incorrect opinion. In my world, that is the complete opposite of diversity.

Brendan Eich worked against equal rights.

Don’t you know Karl Popper’s formulation - a tolerant world cannot tolerate intolerance.

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yikes why would you not want companies investing in diversity? Especially if they are the interface to our online world?

Because diversity in the tech world isn't real. Just read about Brendan Eich. He got fired because he had the incorrect opinion. In my world, that is the complete opposite of diversity.

Javascript is not the kind of diversity I want!

But on a more serious note, from the little I know he got fired because he supported banning same-sex marriage. Which is not just about 'opinion'. That's about discrimination and he should be called out for it.

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because diversity in the tech world isn't real. Just read about Brendan Eich. He got fired because he had the incorrect opinion. In my world, that is the complete opposite of diversity.

Javascript is not the kind of diversity I want! But on a more serious note, from the little I know he got fired because he supported banning same-sex marriage. Which is not just about 'opinion'. That's about discrimination and he should be called out for it.

He funded such a campaign, yes. With his private money on his free time. That is not discrimination. He even wrote sorry for causing hurt and pledged to promote equality at Mozilla.

Your comment is a prime example of what's wrong with the tech industry in my opinion.

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#127

Switched to Firefox a few months back. Havn’t missed Chrome at all

To offer a bit of an opposite view here on HN: I give firefox a shot from time to time. I switch all devices to it, and then I use it exclusively all the time. My most recent attempt failed few days ago, after a bit more than a month with it. Firefox performance just doesn't feel the same as chrome, from constant small freezes, to using 100% CPU pretty often. And just overall experience on some platforms - especially…

Same here. I use a 12" MacBook "retina" (not air), which is an ultraportable with a weak CPU. Firefox is borderline unusable, even with uBlock Origin, unless you stick to only 1 or 2 tabs. High def video in YouTube really struggles, Google Maps struggles, and other Google properties like Flights have a habit of freezing up.

Plus the non-native feel you mentioned. No pinch-to-zoom, moving tabs between windows feels clunky, and scrolling feels different than almost every other app.

I try Firefox for Android from time to time, and I also have a lot of issues with polish that make me stop using it every time. Tab management is extremely clunky, the address bar is inconsistent with virtually every other Android text input (e.g. there's a big X that I expect to clear the address bar, but in Firefox this escapes me from input mode). Even getting the toolbars to reappear by scrolling is troublesome - infuriating.

It sucks, because I care about privacy and web diversity, and have been a Firefox user since back in the Phoenix days.

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#128

Not sure how profitable it would be, but if Mozilla created a privacy-focused email client, I would consider leaving the Google ecosystem.

If you mean to say email service, you should look into Proton Mail and Tutanota. They're both great and very privacy focused. Other than that you can check AlternativeTo for other email services:

https://alternativeto.net/software/gmail/

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#129

Not sure how profitable it would be, but if Mozilla created a privacy-focused email client, I would consider leaving the Google ecosystem.

I presume you actually mean an email service and a web email client?

Yes. Looks like Thunderbird is not quite there yet on the web email client front, but it's worth checking out.

Re: In a swipe at Chrome, Firefox now blocks ad trackers by default

#130
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because diversity in the tech world isn't real. Just read about Brendan Eich. He got fired because he had the incorrect opinion. In my world, that is the complete opposite of diversity.

Brendan Eich worked against equal rights. Don’t you know Karl Popper’s formulation - a tolerant world cannot tolerate intolerance.

No he did not. He funded a political campaign. No I do not know that formulation and I completely disagree with that.

It's like saying you need heavy censorship in order to have free speech. Complete bullshit.

Post reply on HN