Live data from Hacker News

Flatland: A Forgivably Flat Classic

americanscientist.org

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: Flatland: A Forgivably Flat Classic

#13
post #10
post #3

Flatland now always reminds me of the Big Bang Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmiXemW_oBQ

Figures that Sheldon would consider himself a higher level hexagon. And that he thought Raj should go after a simple line segment.

In Flatland, all women are portrayed as line segments

Re: Flatland: A Forgivably Flat Classic

#14
post #10
post #3

Flatland now always reminds me of the Big Bang Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmiXemW_oBQ

Figures that Sheldon would consider himself a higher level hexagon. And that he thought Raj should go after a simple line segment.

I've only seen the movie, in which they're not. Given the Victorian origins of the book though, that makes sense.

Re: Flatland: A Forgivably Flat Classic

#15
post #8

I recommend the movie too. There's 2 of them, make sure you watch the half hour one with Martin Sheen, Michael York and Kristen Bell: http://www.flatlandthemovie.com The full length 95 minute one is less favorably held.

I just wanted to point out that the mouseover tones on the navigation on that site are great. Is that a pentatonic scale?

Re: Flatland: A Forgivably Flat Classic

#16
I also recommend A.K. Dewdney's The Planiverse, published in 1984. It tells the story of computer science students who communicate with denizens of a 2D world. The diagrams and graphics are delightful.

I read it when it came out (I was 13) and it's one of the reasons I entered computing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Planiverse

Re: Flatland: A Forgivably Flat Classic

#18

I also recommend A.K. Dewdney's The Planiverse, published in 1984. It tells the story of computer science students who communicate with denizens of a 2D world. The diagrams and graphics are delightful. I read it when it came out (I was 13) and it's one of the reasons I entered computing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Planiverse

I have a copy, nicely weird book.

Re: Flatland: A Forgivably Flat Classic

#20
I found this book to be quite tedious. The whole class analogy (a satirical story line in which many-sided polygons are regarded as more refined than, say, triangles and squares) was just unbearably long-winded to me. I've read the whole critique so many times before.

And the notion that the reader will appreciate the three-dimensional space we live in (or 4-dimensional space-time, if you're like that) by going through a novella-length treatment of a 2d world...did not work for me, let's just say.

If you like the book, and many do, I'm glad. But it's not unanimous.

Post reply on HN