Earlier quoted context omitted.
"minority"
This doesn't help the discussion. Also, anything less than half is a minority.
The hongkongers are protesting, so in Hong Kong your minority is 100% of the residents.
Your statement is deceptive
151–153 of 153 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"minority"
This doesn't help the discussion. Also, anything less than half is a minority.
The hongkongers are protesting, so in Hong Kong your minority is 100% of the residents.
Your statement is deceptive
Is the kind of facial recognition only bad if wielded by a nefarious government? Partly I think that huge DNA databases, biometric databases and millions and millions of cameras would be wonderful for catching criminals. On the other hand, the opportunities for abuse are too many to number. Has anyone written anything interesting on where/how to draw the line?
>Has anyone written anything interesting on where/how to draw the line? I think the book titled '1984' touched on this subject a little
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This doesn't help the discussion. Also, anything less than half is a minority.
Not everyone participates, some are scared probably. The hongkongers are protesting, so in Hong Kong your minority is 100% of the residents. Your statement is deceptive