The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
21–30 of 189 posts
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is optimistic. The rich could also just get rid of all the poor people they don’t need. Armed drones even reduce the need for human soldiers to get that done. Anyways, let’s hope for much more peaceful solutions.
Yes, all those laborers the rich don't need: https://www.angryflower.com/348.html
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#23For example, if I as a parent want to save up and give up my immediate gratification from spending that money so my children have a head start or even a luxurious cushion, what’s wrong with that? That’s me spending my utility the way I want.
With property taxes, ownership turns into renting - you never really own anything and even things you already bought can have their ownership eroded into nothing by subsequent policy.
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eventually, society revolts, and 'the rich' end up owning a place for their head in a basket.
That is optimistic. The rich could also just get rid of all the poor people they don’t need. Armed drones even reduce the need for human soldiers to get that done. Anyways, let’s hope for much more peaceful solutions.
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#25Is there a non govt or non politician dependent way of solving inequality? facebook connected the world not govt or politicians. Google made knowledge and information available to the whole world not a politician or a govt. (I understand there are down sides to these companies products but so is there to govts/politicians)
Even as a thought experiment I would like to see some ideas here to solve inequality in way that just keeps the politician and govt out of it (cos all they do is make the common people foolishly quarrel against each other while they retain power and do what they think is right)
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#26However, global inequality - especially comparing the economic classes across countries - is way down. For instance, Chinese standard of living is far higher today than in the past, as is the cost of their labor - relative to an American worker. In due time, many a Chinese worker will find themselves uncompetitive due to increased costs - much like the American worker before them.
What would put things back into balance is a massive global re-pricing of labor. This is politically unfavorable and those countries that maintain a reserve currency can put it off for a long time.
[1] https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2018/07/Top-Incomes.png
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#27The problem with inheritance taxes, property taxes, etc. is that they erode the meaning of ownership and permanence. For example, if I as a parent want to save up and give up my immediate gratification from spending that money so my children have a head start or even a luxurious cushion, what’s wrong with that? That’s me spending my utility the way I want. With property taxes, ownership turns into renting - you never…
That's just it, we never really own anything anyway.
If the rich are richer than us, it's because we gave our wealth to them, or rather let them take it.
To he who has much, more will be given...
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#28Why is inequality a problem if everyone else’s quality of life is improving? Poverty is lower than ever and most adults in developed countries have a smartphone, an unimaginable luxury that not even the richest could have twenty years ago. Things are good.
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#29I see people throwing ideas and most of these ideas rely on politicians and/or govt doing something. Is there a non govt or non politician dependent way of solving inequality? facebook connected the world not govt or politicians. Google made knowledge and information available to the whole world not a politician or a govt. (I understand there are down sides to these companies products but so is there to govts/politic…
Re: The Rich Can't Get Richer Forever
#30The problem with inheritance taxes, property taxes, etc. is that they erode the meaning of ownership and permanence. For example, if I as a parent want to save up and give up my immediate gratification from spending that money so my children have a head start or even a luxurious cushion, what’s wrong with that? That’s me spending my utility the way I want. With property taxes, ownership turns into renting - you never…
Most people are only successful because of their inheritance.
If you would be forbidden to give your kids more than a million that would solve that problem pretty well, I guess.