Live data from Hacker News

A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

thehustle.co

341–350 of 499 posts

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#341
post #65
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is she a victim?

Arguably because of the power imbalance between intern and President. But definitely because of how Ken Starr and the national media treated her.

Ha, in which direction was the power imbalance -- [old] men will risk their status and livelihood for a "pretty girl", and many a woman has used that to wield power over even the most politically powerful man.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#342

What kind of jewelry did people think they were getting for a few quid?

Cheap status symbols are a bit of a paradox. They are purchased with the intent of being indistinguishable from luxury status symbol at a distance, even though the quality of the item is what gives it status. There is an entire industry of forgery and a culture of shaming because of this.

Many commenters in this thread seem not to have imagined that people get pleasure from owning and using attractive things. I mean, hardly anything has the same appeal to everyone, but most luxury items that are aimed at the middle and upper middle class have more resources spent on making them attractive to look at and use. It's not as though being a "status symbol" was just an arbitrary thing unrelated to that. Conformity and symbolism are part of the value, but only one part.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#343

The modern examples cited weren't nearly as bad: - Lulumon didn't seem to be hurt by Chip Wilson. In fact, the "notoriety" made me aware they they sold men's clothes, too, and I went there and bought some great athletic wear. - Many customers appreciated Barclays' warning not to "pile up debts." That would give me a favorable opinion of a company that offers lines of credit, not a bad one.

Lululemon is genius, their quality is great, but the branding is even better! They revolutionized the exercise wear industry, were single-handedly responsible for "athleisure" and killing denim sales!

Denim killed denim.

For a time, I could buy jeans that fit. That's now all but impossible. Skinny jeans doing much of that.

Prices and fabric quality have gone, respectively, through the ceiling and floor.

I'm approaching a decade denim-free, having broken in my first pair sometime in the 1970s.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#344

Earlier quoted context omitted.

^^ this. Southwest has one of the best, if not the best, safety records of all major air carriers.

The point is that Ryanair is the best. They are smaller than Southwest on most (not all) metrics, but in the same ballpark. Their only accident is a bird strike causing 8 minor injuries.

How can you say an airline that is 35 years old is clearly better than one that is 52 years old based on total anything?

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#345

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How were those people living? Are they single people in their mid 20s with no significant other or kids? Are they making enough to put some towards retirement? I guess if you're willing to sacrifice some things it could work. You're definitely not raising a family of 3-4 in a nicer neighborhood with that amount.

Not everyone considers it a sacrifice to not be married or have kids. For the people who do fewer than half of them are happy that way. We're all pretty bad at knowing what will make us happy in advance.

I'm not exactly saying not having a family is a sacrifice, but where you want to live. The cheapest apartment I could find in my area (before kids/marriage) was about $700 and that's a few cities away in a no-so-great area where cops were getting called to our neighbors every few days. I could go closer to downtown and be in a worse area.

With kids, the cheaper areas have generally worse schools, parks, etc.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#346
post #205

Michael O'Leary being incredibly rude is a key part of Ryanair's branding. If you're paying £19 for a two hour flight, you'll always have the sneaking suspicion that the airline is skimping on maintenance. O'Leary makes it absolutely clear that they save money by treating their passengers like cattle. He carefully cultivates the image of a man who utterly despises his own customers, but is far too miserly to allow an…

As an occasional Ryanair user they don't really treat you like cattle and he doesn't seem to despise his customers though if certain ones piss him off he won't necessarily cover that up. People are so snobby about it - I'd never fly a cheap service with cheap people - I'm better than that kind of vibe. Ryanair is run kind of like a bus service really - pay modest money and they ship you from A to B.

I flew only once with Ryan air, my experience was that I was forced to pay 80 gbp because I hadn't checked in online (when no other airlines force you to do that) and they had us all wait on the tarmac under the rain for 45 minutes before boarding. Plus seats were really cramped.

So, no not worth it for the slight difference of price they offer.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lululemon is genius, their quality is great, but the branding is even better! They revolutionized the exercise wear industry, were single-handedly responsible for "athleisure" and killing denim sales!

>were single-handedly responsible for "athleisure" Pretty sure that was Nike, Adidas, and Puma.

For men perhaps, not for women.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#348
post #346
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an occasional Ryanair user they don't really treat you like cattle and he doesn't seem to despise his customers though if certain ones piss him off he won't necessarily cover that up. People are so snobby about it - I'd never fly a cheap service with cheap people - I'm better than that kind of vibe. Ryanair is run kind of like a bus service really - pay modest money and they ship you from A to B.

I flew only once with Ryan air, my experience was that I was forced to pay 80 gbp because I hadn't checked in online (when no other airlines force you to do that) and they had us all wait on the tarmac under the rain for 45 minutes before boarding. Plus seats were really cramped. So, no not worth it for the slight difference of price they offer.

You wanted to play the game, but didn't care to lookup the rules.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#349
post #331
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an occasional Ryanair user they don't really treat you like cattle and he doesn't seem to despise his customers though if certain ones piss him off he won't necessarily cover that up. People are so snobby about it - I'd never fly a cheap service with cheap people - I'm better than that kind of vibe. Ryanair is run kind of like a bus service really - pay modest money and they ship you from A to B.

I've never had a bus service as bad as Ryanair. You get WiFi, and it's usually to & from downtown, it is cramped but reasonable, and the customer/business relationship usually dies not feel adversarial.

Come to the US and ride a Greyhound then.

Re: A man who destroyed his multimillion dollar company in 10 seconds (2018)

#350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Happiness is relative to expectation. Most people reading this will never feel extreme hunger and have all their material needs met forever, but they will probably also go through things that to them, feel like miserable failures. You might even be forced to leave your cushy jobs and take an annual salary that is what 50 African laborers make in year. And it will possibly take years, maybe well over a decade, to live…

Zoom out from specific circumstances and it seems like human misery is fairly constant. Whether you're scrambling around the forest looking for berries and killing things to eat with pointy sticks or working an office job living in a suburb – I don't really think your emotional experience really changes all that much. I think your misery and delight are driven by the best and worst things in your life and it doesn't…

I think this is also the reason why humans strive to do better. If we're never satisfied with what we have then the only solution is to do even better!
Post reply on HN