exFAT in the Linux kernel
31–40 of 280 posts
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#32Almost every months Microsoft make a more or less major gift to the open source community, this is beautiful. They are the new "benevolent" Google and it's no surprise they're now the number one open source contributor of the world.
They already extorted Android OEMs using exFat patents for billions, might as well try to look nice.
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#33Edit: to expand, the corporate world runs on Excel/PowerPoint/Outlook. Microsoft milks them on Windows/Office licensing and is very aggressive against organizations that try to do Linux deployments. They're a convicted monopolist that got away easily when at some point the option on the table was to split OS and Office into two different companies. If they want to continue to use Office to keep Windows dominant that's their strategy. WSL and their other "love Linux" efforts are all about making sure developers stay on Windows. If you want to do all that fine but don't patronize us by then claiming you love Linux.
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#34I'll believe Microsoft loves Linux when I can install Microsoft Office in my desktop Linux machine. Everything else is marketing. Edit: to expand, the corporate world runs on Excel/PowerPoint/Outlook. Microsoft milks them on Windows/Office licensing and is very aggressive against organizations that try to do Linux deployments. They're a convicted monopolist that got away easily when at some point the option on the ta…
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#35Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> Linux was stuck with 8.3 length filenames for so long. How so? I never had that problem.
.... on FAT partitions
I guess I never noticed a problem because either I mostly use ext3/4, or I am so used to using legally dubious drivers that I forgot they were there.
I mean, who ever gives you a FAT formatted disk? I don't have floppy drive anyway :p
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#37I'll believe Microsoft loves Linux when I can install Microsoft Office in my desktop Linux machine. Everything else is marketing. Edit: to expand, the corporate world runs on Excel/PowerPoint/Outlook. Microsoft milks them on Windows/Office licensing and is very aggressive against organizations that try to do Linux deployments. They're a convicted monopolist that got away easily when at some point the option on the ta…
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#38I'll believe Microsoft loves Linux when I can install Microsoft Office in my desktop Linux machine. Everything else is marketing. Edit: to expand, the corporate world runs on Excel/PowerPoint/Outlook. Microsoft milks them on Windows/Office licensing and is very aggressive against organizations that try to do Linux deployments. They're a convicted monopolist that got away easily when at some point the option on the ta…
This seems oddly specific and arbitrary. What if the engineering effort in porting it over is not economically viable?
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#39Almost every months Microsoft make a more or less major gift to the open source community, this is beautiful. They are the new "benevolent" Google and it's no surprise they're now the number one open source contributor of the world.
They already extorted Android OEMs using exFat patents for billions, might as well try to look nice.
Re: exFAT in the Linux kernel
#40Almost every months Microsoft make a more or less major gift to the open source community, this is beautiful. They are the new "benevolent" Google and it's no surprise they're now the number one open source contributor of the world.