Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But perhaps the strongest selling point of working in the command line is consistency among tools Isn't this.... not true? A lot of the *nix commands have strong consistency, yes, but there are many commands that are just designed poorly and you can't easily pipe them. And what about widely used tools like Google Docs? How could that have a consistent interface in a terminal?
Google Docs is not for development, perhaps I should have been clearer about that. The vast majority of tools for development, devops, system/network administration are consistent, or at the very least consistent enough that it helps towards making the workflow more productive. Not all software is suited for the terminal, that should be obvious. Like you would not want to play a graphically intensive game on the term…
> Not all software is suited for the terminal, that should be obvious
Like wtfutil, the very thing that's linked here on HN???