How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
backreaction.blogspot.com
How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
1–10 of 93 posts
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#2Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#3This was actually a really accessible description for a layperson. Thank you.
This was a nice description of entropy.
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#4>As you have probably noticed, I didn’t say anything about information. That’s because really the reference to information in “black hole information loss” is entirely unnecessary and just causes confusion. The problem of black hole “information loss” really has nothing to do with just exactly what you mean by information. It’s just a term that loosely speaking says you can’t tell from the final state what was the exact initial state.
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#5I've heard this before, but it's so surprising to me, when one of the simplest mathematical operations - addition - is not reversible. e.g. if a+b=4, you can't infer the values of a and b (beyond their linear relationship). This non-injectivity is a kind of summarising, with less information, where more than one state maps to one.
So "evolution equations" (reality) are not like addition; state changes never summarise.
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#6> The important thing is that all evolution equations that we know of are time-reversible. I've heard this before, but it's so surprising to me, when one of the simplest mathematical operations - addition - is not reversible. e.g. if a+b=4 , you can't infer the values of a and b (beyond their linear relationship). This non-injectivity is a kind of summarising, with less information, where more than one state maps to…
The same happens if you apply the standard AND operator to two bits because the output is only one bit, therefore it is impossible to figure out the two input bits. To have a reversible AND operator you can define it like this: f(x1, x2, b) = (x1, x2, b XOR (x1 AND x2)). E.g: f(1,1,0) = (1,1,1). From this output you can get back to the input. This way you can implement a NOT gate as well, and all others gates. At the end you can implement addition using bits and your summation becomes reversible :) You can see that with this definition we are not ereasing any information, hence it becomes reversible.
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#7Maybe there is some recent development I am not aware of an Susskind is wrong though.
More:
- https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/450326/why-is-th...
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#8Do they destroy information? Last I checked they don't: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/29175/why-is-inf... Maybe there is some recent development I am not aware of an Susskind is wrong though. More: - https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/450326/why-is-th...
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#9> The important thing is that all evolution equations that we know of are time-reversible. I've heard this before, but it's so surprising to me, when one of the simplest mathematical operations - addition - is not reversible. e.g. if a+b=4 , you can't infer the values of a and b (beyond their linear relationship). This non-injectivity is a kind of summarising, with less information, where more than one state maps to…
Re: How do black holes destroy information and why is that a problem?
#10Do they destroy information? Last I checked they don't: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/29175/why-is-inf... Maybe there is some recent development I am not aware of an Susskind is wrong though. More: - https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/450326/why-is-th...
That’s why it’s a problem — the two best tested laws of physics contradict each other.
AFAIK if information is lost in a black hole it will also violate the second law of thermodynamics - so really you have many many laws saying it cannot be lost - and Hawking temporarily claimed it will be lost in black holes before recanting and saying it won't.
So ... I don't quite follow. I mean this title is as concerning to me as something that claims the earth is flat.