Live data from Hacker News

Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics?

old.reddit.com

1–10 of 201 posts

Re: Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics?

#2
Romans aren't the outlier here. Most ancient civilizations had a similar level of accomplishment; a one or two outstanding mathematicians every century, a few practical applications, some new rules of thumb. We did have a dark age, after the Romans after all, which likewise produced little (not none) new math.

The question should rather be, what made the Greeks (and, later, others who adopted their deductive, axiomatic method) so exceptionally productive at mathematics?

Or to paraphrase Wigner, why is Hellenistic mathematics so unreasonably effective?

Re: Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics?

#4
post #3

O/T: One real answer, and multiple bot posts, including one about removing another real person's comment. As a person who doesn't read much Reddit, it leaves a really strange impression. Anyway, the top answer was still a cool read.

This is typical of /r/AskHistorians , not Reddit as a whole.

They have an explicit policy of removing any amateurish or unsourced answers, in order to keep quality high.

Re: Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics?

#5
post #3

O/T: One real answer, and multiple bot posts, including one about removing another real person's comment. As a person who doesn't read much Reddit, it leaves a really strange impression. Anyway, the top answer was still a cool read.

It's a "serious" subreddit. Unlike HN (or many other subreddits), where you can say something completely incorrect and be upvoted by the army of uninformed people, /r/askhistorians specifically allows only well-sourced posts.

Re: Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics?

#6
post #3

O/T: One real answer, and multiple bot posts, including one about removing another real person's comment. As a person who doesn't read much Reddit, it leaves a really strange impression. Anyway, the top answer was still a cool read.

This is typical of /r/AskHistorians , not Reddit as a whole. They have an explicit policy of removing any amateurish or unsourced answers, in order to keep quality high.

Doesn't that imply that the rest of reddit which is less heavily moderated has more low quality comments?

Re: Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics?

#7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is typical of /r/AskHistorians , not Reddit as a whole. They have an explicit policy of removing any amateurish or unsourced answers, in order to keep quality high.

Doesn't that imply that the rest of reddit which is less heavily moderated has more low quality comments?

Yes, and IMO it really does.

Re: Why didn't the Romans contribute much to mathematics?

#9
post #2

Romans aren't the outlier here. Most ancient civilizations had a similar level of accomplishment; a one or two outstanding mathematicians every century, a few practical applications, some new rules of thumb. We did have a dark age, after the Romans after all, which likewise produced little (not none) new math. The question should rather be, what made the Greeks (and, later, others who adopted their deductive, axiomat…

> We did have a dark age, after the Romans after all, which likewise produced little (not none) new math.

Use of the term "dark age" is both dramatically inaccurate in many ways [1] and totally elides everything that happened outside of Europe, such as the establishment of algebra as an independent field of mathematical study (AD 800 in Baghdad), the creation of algebraic geometry (AD 1070 in Persia), and the discovery of ways to solve high-order polynomial equations (approximately AD 1200 in India and China).

[1]: https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/01/medieval-history-wh...

Edit: Fixed a location.

Post reply on HN