Live data from Hacker News

Cryptic, allusive messages from Hong Kong's wealthiest tycoon

languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu

1–10 of 189 posts

Re: Cryptic, allusive messages from Hong Kong's wealthiest tycoon

#4
The impasse Hong Kong finds itself must be solved by the Chief Executive. Her leadership in this matter is severely lacking and one wonders if the has any autonomous power at all, or if its all controlled by Beijing. Especially seeing how she evaded that question quite gracelessly a few days ago when asked by a reporter.

Re: Cryptic, allusive messages from Hong Kong's wealthiest tycoon

#6
post #5

Can someone who knows HK weigh in on how likely this is to be subtle deliberate messaging, or whether it’s like Qanon (where “Q” just says vague things, and the followers go wild with all sorts of interpretations that confirm what they already think).

The second part seems pretty direct.

Re: Cryptic, allusive messages from Hong Kong's wealthiest tycoon

#7
post #6
post #5

Can someone who knows HK weigh in on how likely this is to be subtle deliberate messaging, or whether it’s like Qanon (where “Q” just says vague things, and the followers go wild with all sorts of interpretations that confirm what they already think).

The second part seems pretty direct.

The discussion being entirely banned on Weibo also implies that it's deliberate.

Try searching "李嘉诚发声" and you'll get a message saying "According to relevant laws, regulations and policies, this page is not found"

Re: Cryptic, allusive messages from Hong Kong's wealthiest tycoon

#9
That appears to be an incredibly classy thing to do, at no small risk to himself.

The billionaires have the most to lose with any social unrest, and he exposed himself to support the masses.

If so: Respect

Counter-possibility: it's a CYA maneuver, which supports both sides simlutaneously and either message can be declared as "intended" post-hoc.

Re: Cryptic, allusive messages from Hong Kong's wealthiest tycoon

#10
If you speak Chinese, you'll find it's very easy to squeeze sentences in exact same characters. Almost all poems in China (except very modern ones) do this.

It's so easy that people in forums do this a along - being sarcastic or just funny. You could have positive meaning literally, but hide dirty words in structures.

Also because it's so easy that this was defined as serious crime in many dynasties. There were even people committed it by coincidence were sentenced to death.

Post reply on HN