Live data from Hacker News

Preindustrial workers worked fewer hours than today's (2009)

groups.csail.mit.edu

1–10 of 523 posts

Re: Preindustrial workers worked fewer hours than today's (2009)

#7
This is true, and it's interesting.

However, it's also important to keep in mind that there was also a lot of grinding poverty and near-starvation during the off-seasons.

A peasant family might not have been working during the winter, but its a bit misleading to view that period as "leisure time."

Re: Preindustrial workers worked fewer hours than today's (2009)

#8
This article is somewhat surprising. It does not seem to account for variation in the intensity of work at different times, for example planting and harvest. At those times it's hard to imagine that people worked anything less than dawn to dusk to ensure they had food for the next year.

Re: Preindustrial workers worked fewer hours than today's (2009)

#9
post #6
post #3

Than we.

Common usage indicates that "than us" is just fine. Remember English grammar doesn't come from a grammar book - grammar books are merely imperfect attempts to describe common English usage.

Common usage comes from users. Us have every right to apply our pressure on the common usage.

Re: Preindustrial workers worked fewer hours than today's (2009)

#10
post #7

This is true, and it's interesting. However, it's also important to keep in mind that there was also a lot of grinding poverty and near-starvation during the off-seasons. A peasant family might not have been working during the winter, but its a bit misleading to view that period as "leisure time."

The article argues that even when they had a chance to work more they didn't. Maybe they were all being shortsighted, or maybe that happened in a brief climactic golden age.
Post reply on HN